查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 從國際法論「中國反分裂國家法」有關法理上之問題=Jurisprudential Problems of China's Anti-Secession Law from the Perspective of International Law |
---|---|
作 者 | 鄧衍森; | 書刊名 | 臺灣國際法季刊 |
卷 期 | 2:3 民94.09 |
頁 次 | 頁13-50 |
專 輯 | 中國反分裂國家法與國際法 |
分類號 | 579.27 |
關鍵詞 | 形式主義; 工具主義; 承認; 武力使用; 人權; 主權; 國家身分; 國際法院; 國際刑事法院; 全球治理; Formalism; Instrumentalism; Recognition; Use of force; Human rights; Sovereignty statehood; International court of justice; International criminal court; Global governance; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 為因應中國在2005年3月14日通過「反分裂國家法」所發動之法律戰,本文從國際法觀點探討該法在法理上之缺失並說明涉及中華民國法人格相關之國際法問題。探討此等問題,本文首先處理的問題是,在台灣目前施行憲政所稱之中華民國,是否為一主權獨立之國家?台灣或中華民國為何無法獲得國際社會大多數國家之承認?承認是否為國家存在之必要條件?其次說明本法之立法原理發生謬誤之處及其原因,接著分析本法之施行,可能構成違反國際法之原因與法律基礎,之後重新檢討國際法關於國家主權之概念與其演變,藉以批判傳統之主權理論僅論及對外主權之意義下,似乎與現今國際社會重視人權與全球治理之概念有所扞格以及違誤之處。 |
英文摘要 | In order to cope with the legal war instituted by the People's Republic of China in enacting "Anti-Secession Law" against the Republic of China on March 14, 2005, this article is written for the purpose to enquire into some legal problems and jurisprudential fallacies of the enactment from the perspective of international law, and further to that purpose, to elaborate the question of legal personality and statehood of the Republic of China in that connection. First, this article devotes to investigate the question whether the constitutionalism in Taiwan under the name of the Republic of China is sufficient for the existence of a sovereign State in International Law? Why is Taiwan or the Republic of China not getting proper recognition from other States in international community? Is recognition a prerequisite for a State to get its statehood? Secondly, to explain the legal problems concerning the legislative theory of the statute vis-à-vis international law; thirdly, to deal with the questions of the violation of international law when the People's Republic China resorts to non-peaceful means to solve the issue of independence of Taiwan as provided in the statute; afterwards, finally, to elaborate the evolving concept of sovereignty under the emerging idea of global governance and human rights, in this connection, leads to the conclusion that the ideology behind the statute is awkward and impractical in contemporary international law. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。