查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 臺灣競技運動員運動禁藥管制認識之調查--以羽球運動員為例
- 臺灣地區大專運動員運動禁藥管制之調查:2000年及2004年的比較
- 運動員使用糖皮質類固醇對運動表現之影響
- 熱交換器測漏方法
- 果汁糖度檢測模式之研究
- 混凝土品質非破壞檢測自動化技術
- PCR for Direct Detection of Edwardsiella Tarda from Infected Fish and Environmental Water by Application of the Hemolysin Gene
- 以QBC[feb9]血液寄生蟲檢測法診斷瘧疾之效率
- 道路交通管理處罰條例之修正研究
- 番茄撞擊之黏彈模型的研究
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 臺灣競技運動員運動禁藥管制認識之調查--以羽球運動員為例=Survey of Doping Control in Taiwan's Badminton Athletes |
---|---|
作者姓名(中文) | 姜金龍; 莊鑫裕; 林銘祥; | 書刊名 | 運動生理暨體能學報 |
卷期 | 3 民94.12 |
頁次 | 頁109-119 |
分類號 | 528.9013 |
關鍵詞 | 羽球; 運動禁藥管制; 檢測; 處罰; 市售藥品; Badminton; Doping control; Testing; Sanction; Over-the-counter drugs; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本研究目的在瞭解台灣競技運動員對運動禁藥管制的認識,以提供防治運動禁藥之參考。調查對象以2000年和2004年全國大專院校運動會和2004年全國羽球排名賽之羽球運動員為研究樣本,其研究方法為問卷調查法,研究工具為自編之「運動禁藥管制問卷」,包含「基本概念」、「採樣程序」、「罰則內容」和「市售藥品」四項內容。這兩年共計發出問卷199份,有效問卷180份,其中包含三個組別(大專乙組、甲組和羽協甲組)。結果發現:(一)多數運動員(70%左右)知道運動禁藥管制的「基本概念」,但知道「檢測程序」和「罰則內容」的運動員並不多(40%左右)。(二)這兩年大專甲組運動員對「基本概念」(χ^2(下标 1,776)=5.060, p<.05)和「檢測程序」(χ^2(下标 1,675)=13.024, p<.05)的認識顯著提升,乙組運動員則對「檢測程序」的認識提升(χ^2(下标 1,389)=6.280, p<.05)。(三)不同運動水準運動員對運動禁藥管制的認識有差異(p<.05),且運動水準越高對運動禁藥管制的認識越多。結論指出台灣羽球運動員對運動禁藥管制的認識不夠深入,因此,建議加強運動員對運動禁藥管制的深度教育。 |
英文摘要 | The aim of this study was to understand differences of doping control recognition in Taiwan badminton athletes. A questionnaire was designed to recognize the doping control (basic concept, testing, sanction & over-the-counter drug) by researchers. Subjects were selected through stratified sampling from the National College Student Game in both 2000 and 2004 and National Badminton Championship in 2004. One hundred and ninety nine questionnaires were completed and 19 were excluded due to incomplete data. They were divided into three groups (elite, high-level & non-high-level). Descriptive statistics and chi-square test were applied in this study. Results showed that: a) most athletes (about 70%) knew the basic concepts. However, only about 40% athletes knew completely procedures of testing and sanction content; b) high-level athlete's recognition of basic concepts (χ^2(subscript 1,776)=5.060, p<.05) and testing (χ^2(subscript 1,675)=13.024, p<.05) in 2004 was higher than that in 2000. And non-high-level athlete's testing recognition was the same (χ^2(subscript 1,389)=6.280, p<.05); c) various levels were significant difference on recognition of doping control (p<.05), whereas, elite had greater recognition. It was concluded that badminton athletes did not recognized deeply in doping control in Taiwan. We suggest that sport institutions should provide more educational courses of doping for athletes. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。