查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 臺灣地區大學校院「學生評鑑教師教學」制度之研究
- 國立中山大學管理學院教學績效評量制度之研究
- Faculty Evaluation is Necessary in Higher Education
- The Effect of Subject Area and Instructor Gender on Student Ratings of Instruction
- Faculty and Student Attitudes toward Student Ratings of Instruction
- An Application of Regression Models with Student Ratings in Determining Course Effectiveness
- Teachers College Faculty Attitudes toward Student Ratings: The Comparison between Required Policy and Optional Policy
- 我國大學校院學雜費政策之探析
- Results of Student Ratings: Does Faculty Attitude Matter?
- 大學教學優良教師評鑑指標的建立--教學資源中心教師評鑑個案研究
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 臺灣地區大學校院「學生評鑑教師教學」制度之研究=College and University Student Ratings Systems in Taiwan |
---|---|
作 者 | 張德勝; | 書刊名 | 師大學報. 教育類 |
卷 期 | 50:2 民94.10 |
頁 次 | 頁203-225 |
分類號 | 521.66 |
關鍵詞 | 學生評鑑教師教學; 教師評鑑; 高等教育; 大學校院; Student ratings of instruction; Evaluation system; Higher education; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 辭本研究旨在探討台灣地區大學校院「學生評鑑教師教學」之制度並比較公私立學校之間對此制度的異同。研究對象包含36 所公立學校及40 所私立學校。研究方法以文件分析及問卷調查為主。分析的內容主要包含各校實施「學生評鑑教師教學」的背景、實施程序、評鑑工具、資料處理及結果應用。本研究重要的發現如下: 一、有八成多的學校已經全面實施「學生評鑑教師教學」制度。 二、只有四成五的學校有「學生評鑑教師教學」的辦法。 三、近七成的學校由教務處課務組為來負責教學評鑑的行政工作。 四、超過六成學校仍由教務處負責評鑑工具的編製。 五、不到一成的學校有學生代表參與評鑑工具的編製。 六、有八成的學校全校使用同一種評鑑工具。 七、不到五成的學校建立的評鑑工具的信、效度。 八、評鑑資料分析以提供教師該科目的平均數最多。 九、評鑑結果只提供教師教學與人事決策參考,極少提供學生選課參考。 十、只有三成的學校會提供教學諮詢服務給評鑑結果較為不佳的教師。 十一、公私立大學院校在「學生評鑑教師教學」的背景、實施程序、評鑑工具、資料處理及結果應用都沒有顯著差異。 最後,本文根據研究發現,提出結論與相關之建議。 |
英文摘要 | The purpose of this study was to investigate the systems used by students at colleges and universities in Taiwan to rate their professors. The sample consisted of 36 public colleges/universities and 40 private colleges/universities. Two research methods were involved. Method one was an analysis of college/university documents related to student ratings. These documents were concerned with the regulations and instruments for, and the reports on, student ratings from each college/university. Method two was a survey of the officials who took charge of the student ratings system at each college/university. Both methods were implemented between March and April, 2001. Some important findings are as follows: 1. More than 80% of the schools in the sample had implemented student ratings systems. 2. Approximately 46.1% of these schools have built student ratings regulations. 3. 68.4% of the schools have an academic affairs division in charge of the administration of student ratings. 4. Approximately 60.1% of the schools have an academic affairs division in charge of the development of student ratings instruments. 5. More than 90% of the schools do not have student representatives who participate in the development of student ratings instruments. 6. 80.3% of the schools use a school-wide instrument. 7. Less than 50% of the schools have a reliability test and construct the validity of student ratings instruments. 8. The mean for each academic subject is the most-used statistic for the results output. 9. Only three schools have published the results of their student ratings. 10.Approximately 30% of the schools offer an instructional consultation service for faculty. 11.There is no significant difference between public colleges/universities and private colleges/ universities regarding the student ratings system. Based on the results of this study, some conclusions are drawn and suggestions are made for future study. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。