查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 論遲誤準備程序之失權=The Preclusion in the Pre-Trial Procedure |
---|---|
作者 | 吳從周; Wu, Chung-jau; |
期刊 | 東吳法律學報 |
出版日期 | 20050400 |
卷期 | 16:3 民94.04 |
頁次 | 頁47-138 |
分類號 | 586.4 |
語文 | chi |
關鍵詞 | 準備程序; 失權; 集中審理原則; 訴訟促進義務; 一般訴訟促進義務; 特別訴訟促進義務; 延滯訴訟; 絕對延滯概念; 相對延滯概念; Pre-trial procedure; Preclusion; Concentration; Duty to facilitate litigation process; General duty to facilitate the litigation process; Special duty to facilitate the litigation process; Delay of litigation process; Absolute delay of litigation process; Relative delay of litigation process; |
中文摘要 | 從實務的運用來看,準備程序的失權是我國民事訴訟法最重要的失權類型。本文從「訴訟促進義務」的內涵出發,強調訴訟促進義務應限於立法原意的「當事人」之訴訟促進義務,德國通說及實務與我國通說所擴張得出的「法院」的訴訟促進義務之概念,不宜再使用。再者,第二百七十六條準備程序之失權,在類型特徵上應屬「一般」訴訟促進義務,性質上較接近於第一百九十六條第二項之規定,與第二百六十八條之二第二項的「特別」訴訟促進義務之類型,應屬有別,第二百七十六條之主觀歸責事由因而宜與第一百九十六條第二項以「重大過失」為標準,第二百六十八條之二第二項亦不宜準用第二百七十六條。本文最後參考德國學說嘗試建構第二百七十六條失權規定的構成要件要素,評析現行法之規定,並以之分析檢討我國最高法院之判決。 |
英文摘要 | From a practical point of view, the preclusion in the pre-trial procedure is the most important type of preclusion of the civil procedure law. Beginning with the concept of “duty to facilitate the litigation process,” this article emphasizes that this duty should be limited to the “parties” of the litigation based on legis1ative intent. The prevailing theory and practice in Germany and Taiwan which expand the duty to facilitate the litigation process to include the “court” is no longer suitable. Further, the nature of Article 276 (preclusion in the pre-trial procedure) is more similar to Article 196 and different from Section 2 of Article 268-2. Both Articles 276 and 196 have the characteristics of general duty to facilitate the litigation process, contrary to Section 2 of Article 268-2 which has characteristics of a specia1 duty to facilitate the litigation process. The subjective element (mental state) required by Article 276 should be “gross negligence” which is adopted by Article 196. Therefore Section 2 of Article 268-2 shall not apply the provisions of Article 276. At the end, this article tries to formulate the elements of Article 276 by reference to German theories; comments on the current provisions of civil procedure law; and analyzes and discusses the Supreme Court judgments |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。