查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 我國WTO義務履行的國際法基礎--以米酒稅調降事件對美諮商為例
- WTO爭端解決體系之研究
- 從GATT規範暨實務論美國培利修正案
- 世界貿易組織與其對臺灣貿易的影響
- WTO爭端解決機制之個案研析--以美歐香蕉貿易裁定案為例
- WTO規範下海峽兩岸新金融法秩序之展望
- 國民健康與WTO規範--以我國推動之「國血自足」政策為探討中心
- 「公民與政治權利國際公約」與「經濟、社會與文化權利國際公約」在我國最高法院與最高行政法院適用之研究
- 國際建制在美中貿易談判中扮演之角色:以WTO為例
- Section 337 of the US Tariff Act in the Context of United States Obligations under the WTO Legal Framework with Focus on Patent Enforcement Measures
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 我國WTO義務履行的國際法基礎--以米酒稅調降事件對美諮商為例=International Law Foundation of Taiwan's WTO Obligation Compliance--The Rice Wine Taxation Bargaining against US as a Case Study |
---|---|
作者姓名(中文) | 周旭華; | 書刊名 | 政大法學評論 |
卷期 | 87 民94.10 |
頁次 | 頁315-381 |
分類號 | 558.069 |
關鍵詞 | 世界貿易組織; 國民待遇; 菸酒稅; 條約法; 有權機構; 上訴機構; 履行; 議價; 國際建制; 理性抉擇; WTO; National treatment; Liquor tax; Law of treaties; Competent body; Appellate body; Compliance; Bargaining; International regime; Rational choice; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | WTO是以規則為導向的體系,會員的行為深受法律邁制之約束,其義務履行彈性空間之大小有無,常繫於該會員的國際法義務內容與拘束力,以及主要對手國對於相關法律義務的認知及實踐。本文以米酒稅調降對美諮商事件為例,檢視WTO相關規定及我國在WTO下所作之承諾,以釐清我國在WTO下的國際法義務及其履行決策之空間。鑒於解釋問題對義釐清之重要性,本文亦探討WTO有權機構,尤其上訴機構,對相關條文的解釋及實踐。此外,本文亦檢視對手國──美針對相關法律義認知及實踐。在釐清我國的國際法義務及對手之認知與實踐後,本文嘗試在國際法義務的基礎上,運用理性選擇的模式,分析我國面對類似事件之提擇選項與決策思維。 |
英文摘要 | The WTO is a rule-based system. The behavior of each WTO member is constrained by the legal regime. The decision-making space in complying with a specific legal obligation under the WTO depends on the contents and binding ‘strength’ of the concerned norms and rules on the one hand, and the legal perceptions and practice of its major opponents on the other. Taking the rice wine tax bargaining against the US as an example, this article firstly examines the relevant WTO norms and rules as well as the commitments Taiwan has undertaken in order to clarify its legal obligations and compliance decision-making space under the WTO. It then discusses the relevant interpretation and practice by competent authorities such as the Appellate Body. Next, it looks at the US’s perceptions and practice in the relevant legal obligations and assesses the decision-making options in the referred case. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。