查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 契生昭明辨
- 銀行與借款者考慮誘因機制式的貨款契約設計原則--在借款者風險程度為連續情況下
- 真正還是不真正?論工程契約中業主協力行為之性質--最高法院97年臺上字第360號民事判決之評釋
- 我們是有默契的團隊?--默契的概念與內涵之探討
- 鳳的傳人--論中國上古史的二元對立
- 新疆統一公司契作蕃茄與產銷經驗
- 契丹大字六十年之研究
- 英國文官的政治中立--矛盾與困境
- A Model of Contracting and Hedging: Theory and Application to the Hog Industry
- Ch'i-Sung as a Critic of Confucianism Represented by Han Yu
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 契生昭明辨=A Textual Research on the Sentence "Qi-Son-Chou-Ming" within the Historical Records of Yin Dynasty |
---|---|
作 者 | 蔡哲茂; | 書刊名 | 東華漢學 |
卷 期 | 3 民94.05 |
頁 次 | 頁1-21 |
分類號 | 610.11 |
關鍵詞 | 契; 昭明; 荀子成相篇; 少昊; 摯; Yin royal lineage; Qi; Chou-Ming; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 自從羅振玉和王國維考出卜辭中殷先公先王的名號,使《史記•殷本紀》所記載的商王世系得到證明之後,學者紛紛以卜辭中出現的人名來附會〈殷本紀〉中的先公,但是卻忽略《史記》材料來源的可靠性。本文從文獻上的材料的比對與出土資料的配合來作探討,試圖說明《史記•殷本紀》所記殷先公「契卒,子昭明立」之誤,並修正歷來對《荀子•成相篇》「契玄王,生昭明。」所作的誤釋。 |
英文摘要 | Ever since Luo Zhenyu and Wang Guowei elucidated the appellations of the ancestors of the Yin royal lineage, thus confirming for its most part the authenticity of the Shang genealogy as recorded by Sima Qian in his殷本紀, scholars have endeavoured to match the names appearing on oracular bones with those of the royal ancestors recorded in the殷本紀, without paying attention to the authenticity of the sources of the史記. This paper attempts to prove that the sentence 「契卒, 子昭明立」 originates from the世本, whose own source is to be found in the sentence「契玄王, 生昭明」 of the 《荀子、成相篇》. It is shown that the latter sentence has been misread as meaning "Qi gave birth to a son named Zhaoming", while its original meaning should read「契是殷人玄王, 天生英明」 ie "Qi was an ancestor of the Yin royal lineage, endowed with great virtues", thus adding to the 殷本紀 a non existent royal ancestor. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。