頁籤選單縮合
題名 | Re-Investigating the Way: Zhu Xi's Daoxue=「道」之再探:論朱熹的道學 |
---|---|
作 者 | 白詩朗; | 書刊名 | 臺灣東亞文明研究學刊 |
卷期 | 2:1 2005.06[民94.06] |
頁次 | 頁135-164 |
分類號 | 125.5 |
關鍵詞 | 朱熹; 理; 氣; 誠; 太極; 價值論; Zhu Xi; Li; Principle; Order; Vital pattern; Qi; Vital force; Material-force; Energy; Cheng; Sincerity; Self-realization; Taiji; Supreme ultimate; Supreme polarity; Axiology; Theory of value; |
語文 | 英文(English) |
中文摘要 | 本論文以建築構成學(architectonic)的角度來詮釋朱熹(1130-1200)道學的四個組成特色:形式(form)、動能(dynamics)、一體性(unification)和價值(value)。此外,文中也將把朱熹的道學放在當代全球比較哲學的對話語鏡中,把它看成是一種「價值學」(axiology)的形式。吾人認為,朱熹的道學或是「道」的教誨,應該被看成是實際生活方式的選項,而非僅僅是歷史的文化道產。如同David Hall和Roger Ames兩人所解釋的,朱熹的道學是「情境化藝術」(ars contextualis)作為關係價值論(relational axiology)形式的一個良好範例。這個論點可以援引朱熹關於「誠」(或是「自我實現」)的理論做為支持。另外,文中也將延伸討論「理」和「氣」在朱熹思想中作為構成要素的關鍵性。 |
英文摘要 | This essay presents in outline of an argument for niterpreting Zhu Xi's (1130-1200) mature Daoxue 道學 philosophy in terms of an architectonic of four configurative traits: form, dynamics, unification, and value. Further, it is proposed that Zhu's Daoxue ought to be considered a form of axiology in terms of contemporary comparative global philosophical dialogue. It is important to try to present Zhu's Daoxue or Teaching of the Way as a living philosophical option and not just a historical artifact; it is, as David Hall and Roger Ames have explained, a fine example of ars contextualis or the art of the contextual as a form of relational axiology. One of the chief examples adduced to sustain this thesis is Zhu's theory of cheng 誠 or self-realization. Further, there is also an extended discussion of the formative role of li 理 principle and qi 氣 vital force as critical elements of the structure of Zhu's thought. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。