查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- Efficiency and Effectiveness of Stroke Rehabilitation after First Stroke
- 談中風病人的重量承擔訓練
- 影響高屏地區中風病人接受復健治療因素的探討
- 腦中風患者接受復健治療的臨床資料和功能恢復情況的研究
- The Influence of Rehabilitation Therapy on the Prognosis for Stroke Patients--A Preliminary Study
- Modeling and Identification of Pendular Motion of the Lower Leg in Normal and Stroke Subjects
- 中風病人使用手杖及未使用手杖步態之比較
- 住院中風病人主要照顧者負荷及其相關因素之探討
- 社區中風病人主要照顧者的需要
- Factors Influencing Functional Independence Outcome in Stroke Patients after Rehabilitation
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | Efficiency and Effectiveness of Stroke Rehabilitation after First Stroke=初次中風病人復健治療的效率和效果 |
---|---|
作 者 | 林昭宏; 張靖敏; 劉景寬; 黃茂雄; 林永哲; | 書刊名 | 臺灣醫學會雜誌 |
卷 期 | 99:6 2000.06[民89.06] |
頁 次 | 頁483-490 |
分類號 | 415.922 |
關鍵詞 | 中風; 復健治療; 病人; Stroke; Rehabilitation; Functional recovery; |
語 文 | 英文(English) |
英文摘要 | Purpose: To investigate predictive variables of rehabilitation efficiency and achievement of rehabilitation potential following stroke rehabilitation. Methods: We prospectively studied 110 first-stroke patients consecutively admitted to the inpatient rehabilitation department of our university hospital from 1 January to 31 December 1997. Functional recovery was measured as improvement in the ability to perform the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) instrument. Major medical (side of paralysis, stroke etiology, risk factors, Brunnstrom motor recovery stage, etc.), rehabilitative (initial FIM subscore, interval from stroke onset to rehabilitation commencement, rehabilitation stay, etc.), and demographic (age, years of education, occupation, marital and living status, care-giver, etc.) variables were examined. Results: The mean FIM score was 57.7 �b�n24.5 at admission and 77.3 �b�n26.3 at discharge. The mean rehabilitation efficiency (0.7 �b�n0.7) and effectiveness (30.6 �b�n24.0%) of stroke rehabilitation were determined. Rehabilitation efficiency and rehabilitation effectiveness were significantly predicted by length of stay and arm motor recovery stage, and by age and arm motor recovery stage, respectively. The variance explained only 21% of the rehabilitation efficiency and 24% of the achievement of rehabilitation potential. Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that the large proportion of the unexplained variance in rehabilitation efficiency and effectiveness is due to nonmedical factors influencing the selection of patients for rehabilitation. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。