查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 跳馬項目不同起評分與實施減分對競賽成績影響之分析
- 中國大陸男子競技體操競賽之優勢策略分析:跳馬競賽不同起評分與實施減分對成績影響之研究
- 吊環競賽不同起評分與實施減分對成績影響之研究
- 男子競技體操優勢策略致勝規律研究:吊環項目難、美優先順序規律對競賽成績影響差異分析
- 2005年世界大學運動會女子競技體操地板競賽不同起評分與實施減分對競賽成績影響暨動作分析與比較之研究
- 臺灣與國際優秀吊環項目選手表現之比較
- 以起評分結構分析女子競技體操平衡木發展趨勢
- 預測2017~2020年新奧運周期競技體操女子跳馬運動發展趨勢與因應策略
- 男子競技體操賽高難度動作出現次數對整套動作起評分影響之分析
- 我國大專組與高中組男子體操選手整套動作起評分的比較研究
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 中國大陸男子競技體操競賽之優勢策略分析:跳馬競賽不同起評分與實施減分對成績影響之研究=An Advantage Strategy Analysis of Men's Elite Artistic Gymnasts of China: The Effects of Different Start Values and Deduction Scores on the Performance during Vaulting Competition |
---|---|
作 者 | 張至滿; 陳嘉遠; | 書刊名 | 大專體育學刊 |
卷 期 | 7:2 2005.06[民94.06] |
頁 次 | 頁187-199 |
分類號 | 528.93 |
關鍵詞 | 競技體操; 跳馬項目; 起評分; 實施減分; 最後得分; Artistic gymnastics; Horse vaulting; Start value; Execution score; Final score; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
英文摘要 | This study examined the advantage theory of the gymanastic contest. Ninety gymnasts from 24 countries were investigated during the 2003 World University Game held in Daegui, Korea. The main purpose was to find out the effects of the performance and the inter-relationships among the winning factors of difficulty, originality, insurance and elegance. The following three categories were used to investigate 4 judges judging 90 gymnasts in group B in terms of their judging scores in 1) the main effects and interaction effects of the different start values and the deduction scoes on the final performance; 2) the judging priority of the difficulty, originality, insurance, and elegance; and 3) the winning strategy used by Chinese Taipei and China teams. The results of the statistical analysis revealed three points. First, significant effects were found in high start values and low deduction scores, but no interaction effects were found between these two variables. Second, significant correclation was found between the start values and the final scores of the 90 gymnasts (.843, p<.01); the deduction scores and the final scores (.535, p<.01). the landing stability and the final scores (.522, p<.01); the landing stability and the decuction scores (.899, p<.01) respectively. The start values and the deduction scores totally accounted for 99.5% of the variation. The judging priority of start values (.842) was found to be greater than the deduction scores (.533). 3) The winning strategies of China team were due to using high start values and low deduction scores, and due to use of originality. This study suggests that the Chinese Taipei team needs to improve its start values of difficulty and technical elegance factor for better performance. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。