查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 跳馬項目不同起評分與實施減分對競賽成績影響之分析
- 中國大陸男子競技體操競賽之優勢策略分析:跳馬競賽不同起評分與實施減分對成績影響之研究
- 吊環競賽不同起評分與實施減分對成績影響之研究
- 男子競技體操優勢策略致勝規律研究:吊環項目難、美優先順序規律對競賽成績影響差異分析
- 2005年世界大學運動會女子競技體操地板競賽不同起評分與實施減分對競賽成績影響暨動作分析與比較之研究
- 男子競技體操賽高難度動作出現次數對整套動作起評分影響之分析
- 臺灣與國際優秀吊環項目選手表現之比較
- 以起評分結構分析女子競技體操平衡木發展趨勢
- 預測2017~2020年新奧運周期競技體操女子跳馬運動發展趨勢與因應策略
- 我國大專組與高中組男子體操選手整套動作起評分的比較研究
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 跳馬項目不同起評分與實施減分對競賽成績影響之分析=An Analysis of the Effect of Different Start Value and Deduction Score on the Performance during Vaulting Competition |
---|---|
作者 | 陳嘉遠; 張至滿; Chen, Jia Yean; Chang Chih Man; |
期刊 | 文化體育學刊 |
出版日期 | 20040600 |
卷期 | 2 2004.06[民93.06] |
頁次 | 頁285-298 |
分類號 | 528.935 |
語文 | chi |
關鍵詞 | 競技體操; 跳馬項目; 起評分; 實施減分; 最後得分; Artistic gymnastics; Horse vaulting; Start values; Deduction score; Final score; |
中文摘要 | 本研究目的在應用競賽優勢理論,透過統計分析方法,探討在2003年韓國大邱世界大學運動會體操錦標賽,瞭解24國90位男子選手於跳馬項目,其致勝因素:「難、新、穩、美」等對競賽之演出成績影響;具體目的在於了解B組4位裁判員評定90位選手成績之:1)信度、效度與客觀性;2)起評分、實施減分、動作類別、著地穩定與最後得分的集中趨勢情形。以經以描述統計集中趨勢與單因子變異數分析,其結果顯示如下:1.起評分與實施減分均具有信度效度與客性,裁判評分一致性高。2.致勝因素:「難、新、穩、美」對成績之影響發之現象如下:①起評分(難):有發展難度追求高起評分之現象。②動作分類(新):第3、4與5類之動作,均可獲高分。第3、4類組的動作具多元性、第5類組的動作具有稀少性,其變化空間較容易開發獨特性。③實施減分(美):選手一半以上維持競技體操之基本精神「不以犧牲完美之姿勢來完成高難度之動作技術。」④著地穩定程度(穩):實施上有重大失誤之著地減分超0.50分以下較成功著地者52人佔(57.8%),顯示出重大失誤比率較偏高現象。 |
英文摘要 | This study purpose is to use the advantage theory of the contest, through the analytical method of statistic, probe into 2003 Korea’s Daegui Gymnastics Championship in Universiade, find out about 90 gymnasts of 24 countries in the horse-vaulting, factor that it wins victory: ‘Difficulty, Originality, Insurance, Elegance’, etc. to influence the performance of the competition; It lie in concrete purpose that understand B group of 4 judges scoring on the: 1) Reliability, Validity and Objectivity; 2) measures of central location about start values, deduction score, vault groups, landing stabile and final score. After through statistical analysis with measures of central location, one way ANOVA, its result shows as follows: 1) start values and deduction score both have reliability, validity and objectivity, that is the judges evaluation higher to consistence. 2) Factors that it wins victory: ‘Difficulty, Originality, Insurance, Elegance’, etc. to influence the performance of the competition were as follows phenomenon:① Start value (Difficulty): Degree of difficulty of development purses the phenomenon marked high.② Vault groups (Originality): The third, 4th and 5th Vault Groups are can obtain the high score. ③ Deduction score (Elegance): Gymnast’s over half maintains the basic spirit of the Artistic Gymnastics that do not finish vault group of highly difficult technology by expense of the perfect posture. ④ Landing presentation (Insurance): Demonstrate great fault rate than the phenomenon on the high side. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。