查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 非同步遠距協同設計平台使用經驗之焦點團體研究=A Focus Group Interview of the Users' Experience on the Asynchronous Remote Collaborative Design Platform |
---|---|
作 者 | 張文德; 閻建政; 陳建雄; 李來春; | 書刊名 | 銘傳學刊 |
卷 期 | 14 2005.03[民94.03] |
頁 次 | 頁105-119 |
分類號 | 440.8 |
關鍵詞 | 設計; 遠距協同設計平臺; 焦點團體訪談; Design; Remote collaborative design platform; Focus group interview; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 隨著設計e化技術的急速開發,透過遠距管理平臺的整合,設計專業已邁入數位化的知識經濟時代。其中,設計平臺的管理候、遠端設計師和系統間的互動情形,及其連帶衍生的可用性與滿意度等議題正引起人/電腦介面(Human Computer Interaction or Interface/HCI)一類學門的熱列討論。從焦點團體訪談法(focus group interview)切入,有助於彙整使用意見,使設計產業、資訊工程專業、及實際操作三者的距離拉近,有利於遠距平臺或互動介面設計需求的探索。 本研究以非同步遠距協同設計平臺,配合設計個案的運作及質性焦點團體訪談研究法,深入探究遠距互動下各參與角色的感受和期望,提供焦點團體訪談法在設計專業領域的應用案例。研究結果顯示,遠距協同設計管理平臺極具發展潛力,其相關指標的建置與操作者意見的深入發掘息息相關。研究中以兩平行方式進行,發現質化研究可能因為參與者、地點、時間或其他主觀因素導致所得結果不同的問題,就兼顧量化與質化研究優勢的立場而言,未來應可藉由多組參與人員或多次訪談但相同議程,相同實驗環境及主持人等因素的控制,驗證此類研究在重複執行或增加樣本量後,量化數據轉換推演的可行性。 |
英文摘要 | With the rapid development of design e-technology and the intergration of the remote management platform, the profession of design has evolved to the digitalized knowledge economy. The interacting status among managers, remote designers in relation to the human experiences such as usability, enjoyment, and satisfaction caused plenty of arguments in HCI (human computer interaction interface) field. Focus group interview can shorten the gap among the design, information engineering profession, and user experience. This study was carried out using a practical simulation platform accompanying with a case study and qualitative research method to deeply explore the feelings and expectations of the participants. The research outcome revealed that the potentiality of the remote collaborative design platform and the construction of its related indices must depend on the understanding of the users’ opinions in depth. As demonstrated by the two parallel groups, qualitative research would varied by the factors such as participant, environment, timing, and other subjective reasons. From the integrative perspective of both qualitative and quantitative, once more participants with the same interview procedure, and the related key factors such as environment and mainpulator were controlled carefully; it is possible to bridge both paradigms in the future. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。