頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | World History in the Twenty-First Century and Its Critics=二十一世紀的世界史及其批判 |
---|---|
作 者 | Tortarolo, Edoardo; Tortarolo, Edoardo; | 書刊名 | 臺灣東亞文明研究學刊 |
卷 期 | 1:2 2004.12[民93.12] |
頁 次 | 頁331-342 |
分類號 | 710 |
關鍵詞 | 世界史; 歷史撰述; 史料; 下層研究; World history; Historiography; Sources; Subaltern studies; |
語 文 | 英文(English) |
中文摘要 | 本文旨在處理近年來世界史觀的改變,以及後現代研究方法與下層研究所帶來的挑戰。正如同世界史所被關心的焦點,此議題本身已深刻而明白地被修正為一個令人耳目一新的研究方式。做為歷史學家,不管願意或不願意,都受到「歷史學家的責任不僅只是恢復過去,還在於建構過去」此一觀點的影響。由此,我們對於經典的史實性更為警覺,也比過去對污損及雜匯的文本更加謹慎與敏感,因為這些都會與我們對世界史的理解產生關聯。傳統的歷史撰述已在不斷尋求研究議題及敘述策略的更新中,逐漸被人遺忘,且其基本假設也不斷地遭到質疑。這個激進的挑戰,使得這樣的議題值得被全面而深入地討論。 |
英文摘要 | The paper deals with changes that recently occurred in the views of world history and with challenges coming from the post-modern approach and from subaltern studies. As far as world histories are concerned, it is evident that this subject per se has been deeply revised in a refreshing and innovative way. As historians, we all are, willy-nilly, influenced by the idea that the historian's responsibility is not so much the recuperation of the past, rather the construction of the past. We all are alert to the historicity of canons, and tend to be more sensitive to contaminations and hybrid texts than even in the recent past. In many cases, that are relevant to our understanding of world history, criticism of traditional historiography has gone beyond the quest for a renewal of research topics and descriptive strategies and has questioned basic assumptions of historiography. This radical challenge has implications that are worth discussing in depth. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。