查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 不同環保團體對環境資源願付價值差異之研究--以七股濕地為例
- 生物多樣性資源價值之哲學觀與總價值之內涵--抽象的規範或行動的基石
- 環境敏感地區之保育價值
- 自然資源之經濟效益評估法及條件評估法:文獻回顧
- Imperfect Competition and Common Resource Exploitation: An Analysis of Renewable Resource Management with Non-use Values
- 濕地保育價值與評價:使用價值與非使用價值
- 生態遊憩區價值之估計--假設市場評價法之應用
- Assessment of Intangible Cultural Heritage Value of Baishatun Matsu Pilgrimage
- 農業部門多功能效益評估方法之分析
- 社區居民為地方公共財捐獻的意願:以新設國民中學為例
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 不同環保團體對環境資源願付價值差異之研究--以七股濕地為例=A Study on the Gap of Willingness-To-Pay between Two Environmental Groups for Environmental Resource: A Case of Chi-Ku Wetland |
---|---|
作 者 | 陳中獎; 黃榮福; | 書刊名 | 環境教育學刊 |
卷 期 | 3 2004.11[民93.11] |
頁 次 | 頁17-36 |
分類號 | 361.526 |
關鍵詞 | 條件評價法; 環境信念; 七股濕地; 使用價值; 非使用價值; Contingent valuation method; Environmental attitude; Chi-Ku wetland; Use value; Nonuse value; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 經濟部於七股沿海地區規劃的濱南工業區開發案,由於可能對七股的濕地生態產生嚴重影響,長期以來受到許多環保團體的抗爭。很明顯的,七股濕地對政府與保育團體而言,代表著不同的價值感。保育團體則著眼於濕地的存在價值,而政府關心支持居民生計的經濟發展,這是兩者產生衝突的主要原因。但本研究認為此一環境資源在不同的環保團體眼中,所代表的價值也不盡相同。因此本研究以台南縣黑面琵鷺保育學會及七股海岸保護協會兩團體為樣本,運用可同時評算使用價值(use value)和非使用價值(nonuse value)的條件評價法(Contingent Valuation Method; CVM)來調查兩團體會員對七股濕地的願付價值(Willingness-To-Pay; WTP),七股海岸保護協會願意付費保育濕地的受訪者的平均願付價值為每年781.25元,台南縣黑琵鷺保育學會願意付費的受訪者的平均願付價值為每年1110.29元。此外,建立結合願付價值、所得和環境信念的logit模型並比較兩團體的差異。 |
英文摘要 | Ministry of Economic Affairs R.O.C. planned to build an industry zone in Chi-Ku coastal areas. The neighboring residents concerned very much about the potential environmental damage and consequently opposed this scheme all the while. Many environmental groups that care more about the existence values of the wetlands while governments take care of economic developments supported the resident’s claims. However, not all groups aimed at the same concerns. In this paper, we are interested to find out the gap of environmental concerns between two environmental groups. In this study, two environmental groups were selected as target groups including the Black-faced Spoonbill Conservation Society and Chi-Ku Seacoast Protection Association for their Willingness-to-Pay (WTP) for the Wetland by applying contingent valuation method (CVM). The result shows that Chi-Ku Seacoast Protection Association intend to pay lower at NT$781.25 per year than Black-faced Spoonbill Conservation Society’s at NT$1110.29 per year. Furthermore, a logit model linking WTP, income, and environmental attitude was created to compare the two groups. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。