查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 社會工作研究法教學與學生學習成果評估--以東吳大學社工系碩士班課程為例
- Research-teaching at Different Social Work Education Levels
- 歐洲共同架構在華語教學之應用:以國立臺灣師範大學國語教學中心使用之教材為例
- 「問題導向式學習」於「個案預估能力訓練」之教學應用
- 「處境學習」在社會工作教育中的運用:以大學部「社會工作研究方法」課程為例
- 美國柏金斯職業與應用科技教育法案下後中等院校之計畫方案與其實施成效
- 政治作戰學校電腦課程與教學之研究
- 書評:社會工作需要什麼樣的研究法﹖簡春安、鄒平儀合著. 1998年1月.《社會工作研究法》. 臺北:巨流圖書公司. 468頁
- The Application of the World Wide Web to English Instruction: A Quantitative and Qualitative Study
- Freshman English Programs for Non-English Majors at Universities in Taiwan: An Investigation into the Gap between Expectations and Reality
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 社會工作研究法教學與學生學習成果評估--以東吳大學社工系碩士班課程為例=Evaluation on Social Work Research Teaching and Learning--A Master Curriculum at the Soochow University |
---|---|
作 者 | 周月清; | 書刊名 | 東吳社會工作學報 |
卷 期 | 11 2004.12[民93.12] |
頁 次 | 頁39-87 |
分類號 | 547 |
關鍵詞 | 社會工作研究法; 教學; 社會工作實務; 課程設計; 社會工作教育; 評估; 社會工作研究; Social work research; Social work practice; Social work education; Teaching; Curriculum; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 以東吳大學社工系碩士班「社會工作研究法」課程教學為例,檢視「社會工作研究法」課程教學學生學習成果是否達到其教學目標?是否與實務整合?評估資料來源為一份自擬評量課程教學是否達到預期教學目標的標準化量表,其中也設計開放性問題收集質性資料。研究參與者為自1992至2002年曾修習過作者「社會工作研究法」課程之所有學生,於2003年10月至11月期間,由社會工作研究所辦公室以郵寄(已畢業者)或當場發給(尚在學者)91名參與者,得55份有效問卷,回收率60%。標準化量表分析結果,此課程有達到原設定教學目標,以「有助於對基本的研究概念有所瞭解,包括每一個研究步驟與過程」達成度最高,次為「有助於論文的撰寫」,其次為「有助於自己提升分析與評論能力」與「有助於從實務工作或實習經驗中尋找社工研究主題」;最沒有達成者為「有助於有意識的瞭解研究倫理與政治關係」,次為「有助於不再對研究感到恐懼」。質性資料分析結果,與實務結合目標達成上,包括:實務工作中尋找研究題目、建構研究目的、研究設計及發展研究計畫;學習以評論角度審視實務工作與政策、運用到實務與行政規劃及問題解決等等;學生若為應屆畢業直升研究所沒有工作經驗者,無法回應此課程教學是否能與實務結合;多數參與者有興趣之「研究設計」為:單案研究、質化研究法、發展研究典範等;多位參與者對以小組合作學習、他人經驗分享、實例討論、課堂練習等教學方式表示有幫助及有興趣;參與者對繁重英文閱讀持負面回應最多,次為對上課氣氛、壓力、寫作業、圖書館資料查詢等。參與者對未來碩士博士班研究法課程設計之建議,支持與肯定教學與實務結合,甚或建議藉此教學與實務機構合作,尤其針對博士班學生的論文。 |
英文摘要 | The article aims to evaluate whether the outcome of teaching in master social work research at the Soochow University achieves its teaching goals set in the curriculum, including the integration of teaching and practice. Through October to November of 2003, a self-administered questionnaire was delivered by mail or distributed personally to 91 participants who have taken this course in 1992 to 2002 and tutored by the author; in the end, 55 samples returned with 60% response rate. Based on the analysis of the teaching goals success scale, this course has reached its teaching goals; for instance, ”the course was helpful to understand basic research concepts including each research stage and process” was most achieved, and ”the course was helpful to write thesis proposal”, ”the course was helpful to promote abilities of analyzing and critical thinking” and ”the course was helpful to formulate research issues from practice” were moderate achieved. On the contrary, the goals, such as, ”the course was helpful to understand research ethics and political” and ”the course was helpful to feel free from reluctance and fear” were not attained. Except for the students who have never been working in the practice as a practitioner, the findings from the open-ended questions, the course was useful to the participants' field work, for example, it's helpful to formulate research issues from the practice, know how to build up research purposes and research design, and conduct a research proposal. The participants' most interest in the research designs are: single case evaluation design, qualitative approach, intervention research paradigm and etc; they enjoyed the teaching methods such as group collaborative learning, listening others research experiences, case demonstration, in class exercise and so on. The participants recommended they agreed on the social work research curriculum designed to integrate with practice for both master and doctoral programs. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。