查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 成年心智障礙者及其主要照顧者使用臨托服務影響之研究
- 成年心智障礙者對家庭的影響與未來安置模式選擇因素探討
- 機構式喘息服務對失能老人主要照顧者負荷之影響
- 行政法院迴避經濟社會文化權利公約之適用/北高行100訴118判決[裁判簡評]
- Caregiver Efficacy and Efficacy Determinants for Elderly Care Recipients Who Accept Home Respite Care in Taiwan
- 臺南近海海砂試採作業環境影響分析
- 福利混合經濟下的社區照顧--英國的經驗、臺灣的借鏡
- 社區照顧的政策與實踐--以英國新堡市與臺灣省臺南市為例
- 精神病患社區照顧之省思--社區化或機構化,選擇或困局?
- 新管理主義、社區照顧與社會工作
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 成年心智障礙者及其主要照顧者使用臨托服務影響之研究=Impact of Respite Care Services on Caregivers and Adults with Intellectual Disabilities |
---|---|
作者 | 周月清; 鄒平儀; | 書刊名 | 社會政策與社會工作學刊 |
卷期 | 8:2 2004.12[民93.12] |
頁次 | 頁39-82 |
分類號 | 548.2 |
關鍵詞 | 成年心智障礙者; 主要照顧者; 社區照顧; 臨時及短期照顧服務; 喘息服務; 影響評估; Adults with intellectual disabilities; Carer; Caregiver; Community care; Respite care; Impact; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本研究目的係為暸解成年心智障礙者及其主要照顧者使用臨時及短期照顧服務(簡稱臨托服務)情形,並評估此服務是否有助照顧者壓力舒緩與提升其生活品質,且能促進障礙者社會融合與延緩機構安置程度。針對台北市等九縣市,正在使用臨托服務及使用三個月以上成年心智障礙者共352名從事普查,以主要照顧者為訪談對象,得有效樣本162名,受訪率46%。研究發現,此臨托服務達到支持家庭照顧的功能,但未達到延緩障礙者機構安置與促進其社區融合的顯著意義;此外,使用此項服務的家庭並不多,且多半集中在照顧者是中年人和教育程度較高者。據此,建議此服務仍有必要繼續推廣,且需放寬使用時數的限制,尤其針對居住在非院轄市、主要照顧者為父母或教育程度低者,更宜鼓勵其多參與相關性團體活動,以藉由交流、支持而增進其獲得相關資訊,並強化持續使用此項服務的動機。 |
英文摘要 | The study aims to explore who are the users, how the services used, and what are the effects of the services. The study population is 352, and a survey of all these informal carers in households is conducted to evaluate the scheme, for adults with intellectual disabilities, is provided by 9 local authorities. The characteristics of 162 users whose informal carers voluntarily and successfully participated in the study are identified: who are more from Taipei City, age in 25, fathers with higher education degree, having no low-income family subsidy from the governments. Most of informal carers are female (80.2%) particularly their mothers (72.2%) and age in 51, and 41.3% of caregivers have full time or part time jobs and also join the related parental associations (77.7%). The average history of using the services is 3.1 year, average hours within a year is 12 days, being a member of the NGOs is the main way to access the services, 55.6% of the users are satisfied with the rate of selfpayment, 88.6% are satisfied with the services, and 97.5% will continue to use the services. After respite, there is a statistically significant difference on releasing the caregiver's care burden and psychological stress, improving the caregiver's family and social interaction, social support, life satisfaction. on the contrary, the services are useless to enhance adults' social inclusion and postpone adults' out-of-home placement. To conclude, the respite is supportive in the issue of family care; conversely, it's not a substitute service of institutional care and it's unsuccessful for adults' social inclusion. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。