查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 海德格「基本存有學」與哲學詮釋學之緣起:「存有與時間」思路對高達美哲思啟始之效應歷史
- 「此有之為在世存有」中之辯證性張力:海德格「存有與時間」核心思想脈絡綜觀下之具體主體性初探
- 歷史、歷史意識與實效歷史--論高達美哲學詮釋學中「歷史性」概念之演變
- 高達美詮譯學與黑格爾辯證法--綜論高達美哲學詮釋學生成史中之黑格爾思想
- 高達美哲學詮釋學之原理--理解之歷史性與詮釋學循環
- 高達美遊戲觀的評估與啟發--遊戲觀與宗教論述
- 事理性,歷史性與語言性之體系性:《真理與方法》從「遊戲」經「生命」至「言道」之哲學文本內在性詮釋與神學義理內在性道貫
- 從存有論詮釋學循環到解釋人類學--真理與方法與格爾茲理論運思之緣起
- 對謝大寧「儒家圓教」的再詮釋之質疑:從「道德形上學」到「溝通倫理學的存有論轉化」的可行性之批判
- 從梅洛龐蒂之現象身體論及傳播的身體
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 海德格「基本存有學」與哲學詮釋學之緣起:「存有與時間」思路對高達美哲思啟始之效應歷史=Heidegger's Fundamental-Ontology and the Genesis of Philosophical Hermeneutics: The Thinking-Way of Being and Time and it's Effective-History on Gadamer's Beginning of Philosophizing |
---|---|
作者 | 陸敬忠; Luh, Jing-jong; |
期刊 | 中原學報 |
出版日期 | 20041200 |
卷期 | 32:4 2004.12[民93.12] |
頁次 | 頁667-690 |
分類號 | 147.72 |
語文 | chi |
關鍵詞 | 基本存有學; 存有; 此有; 在世存有; 理解; 時間性; 現象學; 哲學詮釋學; 真理; 效應歷史; 歷史性; Fundamental-ontology; Being; Dasein; Inder-welt-sein; Understanding; Temporality; Phenomenology; Philosophical hermeneutics; Truth; Historicality; Effective history; |
中文摘要 | 海德格哲思對高達美詮釋學性的哲思生成發展之影響誠無庸置疑。然而,海德格本身哲思亦有其生成發展亦即,其哲思啟始及其前期〈存有興時間}(Seinund Zeit)之基本存有學,其哲思之「轉向」(dieKehre)以及其「轉向」後時期。問題在於,在<真理與方法>(Wahrheitund Methode)一書之哲學詮釋學生成中,到底海德格哲思發展那一部分具關鍵性的效應?在此問題視域下所呈顯的課題脈絡乃在於,高達美詮釋學哲思生成與海德格哲思本身發展的互相關聯與差異。而在此主題意識下,本文主在探討〈存有興時間〉之基本思路與此思路本身所蘊含「轉向」之傾向對高達美詮釋學哲思生成之影響,以及後者對「基本存有學」(Fundamentalontologie)之詮釋學性的轉化與批判性的攝納,以及此與「轉向」之傾向底關聯。 基此題旨,本文首先依海式哲思基源問題一存有問題來綜觀〈存者與日寺廟》之基本構思,亦即「此有」之為「在世存有」底基本構思,以及其基此所發展的方法,詮釋學性的現象學之為思路。其次,將依「基本存有學」之思路綜觀此著作,如是將發現關於此有之解析中的兩條進路以及期間之張力,亦即此有之為在世存有之詮釋學性的現象學解析與此有之為具體性的主體之基本存有學式解析,盼得以揭示海德格為何只完成此構思第一部分之前半部而中途邁向「轉向」之線索。然後本文將由以上對海德格〈存有興時周〉之整體思路理解其對高達美哲思之啟發以及高達美對其之轉化,亦即在基源問題上由存有問題至真理問題,在思想透觀上由此有之為在世存有及其時間性至效應歷史意識及其歷史性,以及在哲思進路上由詮釋學性的現象學至哲學詮釋學。最後在本文整體脈絡中綜理出兩者哲思生成發展中之動態同異處。 |
英文摘要 | There is little doubt about the influence of Heidegger's thinking on the genesis of Gadamer's hermeneutic philosophizing. But Heidegger's philosophizing itself has its own genesis and development, i.e. its Beginning the “fundamental-ontology"in Being and Time from eariy Heidegger, its "Turn" and late Heidegger. The problem is, which part of the development of Heidegger's thinking has its key effect on the genesis of philosophical hermeneutics in Truth and Method? The thematic context in the horizon of this question is: how is the genesis of Gadamer's hermeneutic philosophizing and the development of Heidegger's thinking relate to each other and differentiate from each other. Under this thematic consciousness, this essay attempts to search into the basic argument of Being and Time and the implied tendency of the “Turn"in such line of thought, and consequently to research Gadamer's hermeneutic transformation and critical adoption of fundamental-ontology and its relation with the tendency of the “Turn".Therefore, this essay firstly tries to review, according to the question of Being as the original question of Heidegger's thought, the basic conception of Being and Time, i.e. of the Dasein as In-der- Welt-sein the method for it, and the hermeneutic phenomenology as the line of thought. Based on this first point, this essay would secondly examines this work and outline the two approaches and their tension in the analysis of Dasein that is, the hermeneutic-phenomenological analysis of Dasein as Inder- Welt-sein, and the fundamental-ontological analysis of Dasein as concrete subjectivity, in order to find out: why Heidegger only finished the first part of the conception of this work and went halfway to the“Turn"? Thirdly, this essay also provide understanding to the inspiration of the holistic thinking-way of Being and Time on Gadamer's philosophizing and to Gadamer's own transformation of it i.e. concerning the original question, from question of Being to question of truth, with regards to the perspective of thinking, from Dasein as In-der- Welt-sein and its temporality to effective-historical consciousness and its historicality, and with regard to the line of thought from hermeneutic phenomenology to philosophical hermeneutics. Finally from the whole thematic context of this essay, the present paper seeks to outline the dynamic differentiation of Gadamer's philosophizing from Heidegger's thinking in this period of their philosophical development and under this aspect the original elements of Gadamer's philosophical hermeneutics. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。