查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 有沒有廣義的寇斯定理?=Is There a Generalized Coase Theorem? |
---|---|
作 者 | 熊秉元; | 書刊名 | 經社法制論叢 |
卷 期 | 34 2004.07[民93.07] |
頁 次 | 頁103-123 |
分類號 | 550.1 |
關鍵詞 | 寇斯定理; 效率; 法律經濟學; Coase theorem; Efficiency; Law and economics; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 對於經濟學和法學,寇斯定理都有重大的影響; 而且, 在政治領域裡,有所謂「政治的寇斯定理」(Political Coase Theorem)。可是,在社會學的領域裡,寇斯定理卻幾乎不見蹤影。對於這種特殊的現象,本文藉著探討「廣義的寇斯定理」,嚐試回答相關的問題。主要的發現包括:第一,寇斯定理成立的關鍵,是有「公認的量尺」;沒有這個量尺,就無法處理效率的問題。第二,Coase(1960)的論文,在性質上是演繹,和寇斯其他的作品以及本身在方法論上的立場、大相逕庭。第三,寇斯定理,對法學、政治學、社會學等的影響,差別很大;主要的原因,和這些學科探討的主題有關。第四,企業家精神,是推動經濟活動的重要因素;但是寇斯定理和企業精神之間,有潛在的衝突。 |
英文摘要 | Coase argued that economists enjoy the advantage of having “the measuring rod of money” at their disposal; it is argued that what is important is not the measuring rod of money per se. What is important is that htere is a measuring rod of something that is objective, observable, and acceptable to the individuals concerned. If this measuring rod exists, then the Coase Theorem can be extended to a more general setting. In addition, it is known that Coase strongly favors the inductive approach, but the inquiry shows that in both the 1960 article as well as his subsequent defense of the Coaes Theorem, he adopts a deductive approach. This is in sharp contrast with his stated methodological position and is very different from essentially all of his other writings. Moreover, that the Coae Theorem has had significantly different impact on different social sciences can be explained by whether interests of the actors can be readily identified in various activities. The Coase Theorem has its greatest impact on studies that focus activities with clear, concentrated, and piecemeal interests. Finally, the Coase Theorem is most relevant for activities that are repetitive; for activities that involve new events or actifacts, a measure of efficiency is often non-existent and the relevance of the Coase Theorem would therefore be weak. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。