查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 布坎楠和寇斯制度設計理論的比較分析=A Comparison of James Buchanan and Ronald Coase from the Perspective of Institutional Design |
---|---|
作者 | 熊秉元; Hsiung, Bingyuang; |
期刊 | 經社法制論叢 |
出版日期 | 20010100 |
卷期 | 27 2001.01[民90.01] |
頁次 | 頁191-214 |
分類號 | 550.189 |
語文 | chi |
關鍵詞 | 無知之幕; 寇斯定理; 效率; 資訊; Veil of uncertainty; Coase theorem; Information; Efficiency; |
中文摘要 | 在論述裡,布坎楠多次採用「不確定之幕」的思惟方式;而寇斯定理所隱含的思惟方式,可以公「單一主人/財富極大」來反映。表面上看來,這兩種思惟方式南轅北轍,不過本文將論証:在某種特定的條下,布坎楠的思惟方式和寇斯的思惟方式其實是一樣的!此外,本文將嚐試闡明,這兩位經濟學大師思惟方式的內涵和潛在的限制。 |
英文摘要 | The veil of uncertainty as a conceptual device has been adopted by Buchanan in his works, and the Coase Theorem can be interpreted by the conceptual device of a single owner-wealth maximization apparatus. On the surface, these two conceptual devices are unrelated, but it is argued in this paper that under certain conditions, Buchanan's and Coase's conceptual devices are in fact equivalent! In addition, the implications as well as the potential limits of their conceptual devices are derived. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。