查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 源自於想像性同化的「自我」形塑過程:拉崗「鏡子階段」理論之分析
- 皮亞傑認知發展論探討自我調整學習歷程之建構與應用
- 禪坐的時間及省察度與個人自我覺知、自主性的關係研究
- 杜威經驗論在促進學生自我調整學習之啟示
- 何處是我家?--關於郭維國作品中流蕩的自我與再現
- 影響社群網站自我揭露的社會需求因素
- Pregnant with Madness--Ophelia's Struggle and Madness in Hamlet
- "I Am Not What I Am"--The Contradiction and Assimilation of Othello and Hamlet's Images
- 體育教師自我效能之探討
- 同化?抑或對比?:健康狀況的社會比較探討
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 源自於想像性同化的「自我」形塑過程:拉崗「鏡子階段」理論之分析=The Formative Process of the "Ego" from Imaginary Identification: An Analysis of the Theory of Lacan's "Mirror Stage" |
---|---|
作 者 | 蔣興儀; | 書刊名 | 新竹師院學報 |
卷 期 | 18 2004.06[民93.06] |
頁 次 | 頁229-258 |
分類號 | 175.7 |
關鍵詞 | 想像界; 自我; 同化; 拉崗; 鏡子階段; 自戀; Jacques lacan; Ego; Mirror stage; Narcissism; Identification; Imaginary; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本文企圖分析拉崗(Lacan, Jacques)的「鏡子階段」理論,闡述其如何運作出想像界的範域。「鏡子階段」理論主要是以幼兒自身境像的出現,來說明「自我」的形塑過程。在這個自戀的過程中,幼兒同化於鏡中那個顛倒的理念形象,由此開創了他/她的心智起源之歷史。一旦「自我」以一個外在的影像來建立自身的疏離同一性,則此疏離的同一性便於內在的心理現實中與侵略性相結合起來。「自我」一方面不斷地支配與主宰自身,另一方面又持續地臣服與從屬於自身。在這種主動疏離和被動疏離相交織的無止盡同化運動之下,想像的「自我」成功地構成了所謂的心理現實,並且擺蕩在他/她不穩定的內在性與投射的外在性之間。對拉崗而言,封閉在二元對立中的「自我」形成的是有如莫比帶般的迴圈,它的內在與外在交織環繞成一個相對的整體。如果說,此一無縫的整體即是阻礙分析進行的抵抗中心,那麼,心理分析的工作就必須穿透這個想像的整體,進一步發展出解開想像紐結的策略。 |
英文摘要 | This article attempts to analyze Lacan's exposition of “mirror stage” and elaborate its field of functioning in the Imaginary. The theory of “mirror stage” explains the narcissical formation of “ego” by infant's encountering with his/her reflected image in the mirror. By identifying the ideal image that is provided through inverted mirror image, the infant opens the history of his/her mental genesis. Ever since the “ego” establishes the alienated identity of self by an external image, the same alienating identity combines with aggressivity in the psychical reality. The “ego” dominates and commands itself on the hand, and submits and subjects to itself on the other. In this endless play of the alienated-alienating identification, the imaginary “ego” successfully constructs the so-called reality and oscillates between his/her unstable interiority and his/her projected exteriority. For Lacan, the “ego” which closes with dual opposition forms the Moebius strip that encircles interior and exterior as a related whole. If this seamless whole is the center of resistance that obstructs the ongoing analysis, then the entire work of psychoanalysis must penetrates the imaginary whole and develops the logic of knot that unties. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。