查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- The Results of Student Ratings: Paper vs. Online
- The Validity and Reliability of Student Ratings: Comparison between Paper-pencil and Online Survey
- 臺灣地區技術學院暨專科學校圖書館在網際網路上的現況
- The Effect of Subject Area and Instructor Gender on Student Ratings of Instruction
- Student Ratings: What are Hualien Teacher College Students Telling Us?
- Faculty and Student Attitudes toward Student Ratings of Instruction
- 國立中山大學管理學院教學績效評量制度之研究
- 淺談網路調查
- 霧裡看花--網路調查數據如戰國
- 企業對網路調查應有新認知
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | The Results of Student Ratings: Paper vs. Online=「學生評鑑教師教學」之結果:紙筆與網路調查的比較 |
---|---|
作者 | 張德勝; Chang, Te-sheng; |
期刊 | 師大學報. 教育類 |
出版日期 | 20040400 |
卷期 | 49:1 2004.04[民93.04] |
頁次 | 頁171-185 |
分類號 | 522.29 |
語文 | eng |
關鍵詞 | 學生評鑑教師教學; 紙筆調查; 網路調查; Student rating of instruction; Paper survey; Online survey; |
中文摘要 | 本研究主要是比較紙筆調查與網路調查對於「學生評鑑教師教學」結果的差異性。研究對象為九十學年度第一學期國立花蓮師範學院大學部所開設的624門課,包含一年級198(31.73%)門、二年級161(25.80%)、三年級146(23.40%)以及四年級119(19.07%)門,研究工具為「國立花蓮師範學院教學意見反映調查表」共包含四個層面;「準備與計畫」、「教材與內容」、「教法與技巧」、「作業與評鑑」。 研究結果顯示在學生評鑑教師教學所有四個層面及總分,紙筆調查所得的結果都顯著的高於網路調查的結果。在所有的班級中,有573(91.8%)門課,紙筆調查的平均分數高於網路調查的結果。相對的,只有51(3.2%)門課,網路調查的結果高於紙筆調查的結果。研究結果顯示紙筆調查的方式比網路調查的方式,更容易讓學生給任課教師較高的評鑑分數。 |
英文摘要 | The purpose of this study was to compare the results of student ratings of their instructors via paper a nd online surveys. The s ample consisted of students a t 624 undergraduate courses at National H ualien Teachers College in the fall semester of 2001:198 (31.73%) freshman courses, 161 (25.80%) sophomore courses, 146 (23.40%) junior courses, and 119 (19.07%) senior courses. The instrument was the Students' Rating of Instructors (SRI) form developed in 1995 at this college. The SRI form was composed of 13 questions rated on a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from "strongly agree" (5 points) to "strongly disagree" ( I point). These 13 items were clustered around four teaching factors: Preparation/Planning, Material/Content, Method/Skill, and Assignments/Examination. The scores on these four factors were added to give the total score (rating) for a faculty member. The paper scores are significantly higher than the online scores for all of the evaluation items. There are 573 (91.8%) courses for which the average total paper evaluation score is higher than the average total online evaluation score, but only 51 (8.2%) courses for which the average total online score is higher than the average total paper score. These results indicate that the majority of students in all courses give the instructors a higher score when they evaluate them using the more traditional method: sitting in the classroom and using paper forms. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。