查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- Student Ratings: What are Hualien Teacher College Students Telling Us?
- Faculty and Student Attitudes toward Student Ratings of Instruction
- The Effect of Subject Area and Instructor Gender on Student Ratings of Instruction
- Teachers College Faculty Attitudes toward Student Ratings: The Comparison between Required Policy and Optional Policy
- The Effects of a Peer Group Teaching Consultation Program on Teacher Educators' Student Ratings
- 師範學院與非師範學院教師對「學生評鑑教師教學」態度之比較
- The Effects of Students' First Impressions of Instructors on Student Ratings of Instruction
- 提昇教學品質之應有認識--TQM理念在大學教學過程之應用
- 師範學院一般科系學生對籃球技術概念之探討
- 大學教學資源中心的功能探討:以淡江大學教學科技組為例
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | Student Ratings: What are Hualien Teacher College Students Telling Us?=學生評鑑教師教學:花蓮師院學生的評鑑結果告訴我們什麼? |
---|---|
作者 | 張德勝; Chang, Te-sheng; |
期刊 | 暨大學報 |
出版日期 | 20011000 |
卷期 | 5:2 2001.10[民90.10] |
頁次 | 頁169-193 |
分類號 | 522.29 |
語文 | eng |
關鍵詞 | 學生評鑑教師教學; 教師銔鑑; 大學教學; 師範學院; Student ratings; Course evaluation; Faculty evaluation; College teaching; Teachers college; |
中文摘要 | 本研究主要目的是探討科目、班級、學生及教師等因素對學生評鑑教師結果的影響。研究對象是花蓮師範學院八十五學年度第一學期大學部一至四年級的班級,有效樣本是437班。預測變項共分為四類(含十五種):科目變項(科目層級、必選修、科目難度、主副修)、班級變項(班級規模、男生比例)、學生變項(學習熱枕、出席率、成績期待)、教師變項(教師性別、教師等級、教師年紀、教師學位、國外經歷、給分寬嚴)。效標變項為學生對教師教學之反映意見(或稱為學生評鑑教師教學),分為教學準備、教學內容、教學方法、學習評量 四個層面以及整體表現。研究結果如下: 一、科目難度、學生學習熱枕、教師給分寬嚴與教學評鑑各層面及整體表現的分數都有.10以上的半淨相關。 二、所有預測變項與效標變項(教學評鑑各層面及整體表現的分數)都沒有曲線相關存在。 三、逐步迴歸分析之後,預測變項可預測教學準備、教學內容、教學方法、學習評量、整體表現的總變異量百分比依序為49.8%、61.6%、71.0%、61.3%、66.8%。其中又以學習熱 忱、給分寬嚴、科目難度、成績期待較能有效預測學生評鑑教師教學,尤其是學生的學習熱忱。 |
英文摘要 | The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of course, class, student, and instructor characteristics on student ratings of instruction. The sample included 437 undergraduate courses with 96 (21.2%) freshman courses, 140 (32.0%) sophomore courses, 119 (27.2%) junior courses, and 82 (18.8%) senior courses at National Hualien Teachers College in the fall semester of the 1996-1997 academic year. The Student Ratings of Instruction (SRI) form was used to measure students' perceptions of faculty performance. The results indicate that student enthusiasm, expected grade and teacher grading standard are positively correlated with all five evaluation scores. Course difficulty is negatively correlated with all evaluation scores. The high semi-partial correlation coefficients consistently appear in course difficulty, student enthusiasm, and grading standard for all five evaluation scores. None of these 75 correlation coefficients show substantial non-linearity. The percentage of variance explained by different combinations of background variables are 49.8%, 61.6%, 71.0%, 61.3%, and 66.8% for preparation (49.8%), coverage (61.6%), skills (71.0%), and assessment (61.3%); overall, variance was 66.8%. Four of the background variables consistently appearing in the final regression equations are student enthusiasm, course difficulty, grading standard, and expected grade. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。