頁籤選單縮合
| 題 名 | 國小教師與同儕對注意力缺陷過動症標記之知覺研究=The Study of Teachers' and Peers' Perceptions on Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder |
|---|---|
| 作 者 | 蔡明富; 洪儷瑜; | 書刊名 | 特殊教育研究學刊 |
| 卷 期 | 26 2004.03[民93.03] |
| 頁 次 | 頁293-317 |
| 分類號 | 529.68 |
| 關鍵詞 | 教師; 同儕; 注意力缺陷過動症; 標記知覺; Teacher; Peer; ADHD; Label perception; |
| 語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
| 中文摘要 | 研究主要目的在探討國小教師與同儕對ADHD標記學童在學校適應之預測與社會距離之知覺,研究對象為臺北縣市173名國小普通班教師與176名五年級普通班學生,採「ADHD標記知覺問卷」收集語句資料,以內容分析法分析。 研究結果發現:1.教師與同儕預測ADHD學童之學校適應方面:師生之預測內容均可歸納成學習、行為、人際與未特定適應等四類,其中教師易察覺行為、學習適應,而同儕易覺察學習適應,兩群受試均對人際適應之預測不多。在師生預測學校適應各類別細項之內容與感受,主要發現有:除覺察ADHD不專注、衝動與過動主要狀症外也出現學習、行為與人際等其它問題;教易覺察其不專注與過動症狀,但易忽視衝動症狀;在動態教學活動的學習表現會較好;雖易覺察過動、衝動與常規等外向性行為問題,但易忽略內向性行為問題。2.教師與同儕對ADHD學童在社會距離之知覺方面:師生之接納情境類別內容均可分成八大類,在進入班級、參與教學活動性質、學校適應表現、協助指導、了解個案、未特定等六類是相同,但有兩個情境類別不同,教師提出尋求資源協助與教學安排,同儕提出同儕互動與課後活動。教師之接納以協助指導情境提出最多,但同儕則多數提出考量其學校適應的表現。如依師生對接納情境各類別細項之內容與感受,主要發現有:願意幫助ADHD學童改善學習適應困難;對其參與動態教學活動之接納度較高;均不願意接納其出現違反常規行為;教師對ADHD學童的接納需要外在資源協助,同儕在下課一起玩情境對其接納度較高。本研究結果發現師生對於ADHD標記知覺有所差異,可能受其背景與角色影響,此結果較支持符號互動理論對於標記的解釋。 |
| 英文摘要 | The main purpose of the study was to explore the teachers' and peers' perception and ADHD. The subjects of the study were composed of 173 regular education teachers and 176 fifth-graded students from elementary schools in Taipei city and county. The open-end questionnaire of 'The Perception of ADHD Label Inventory' was conducted to collect teachers' and students' response to the label of ADHD. All the responses were analyzed by content analysis. The major findings were concluded as follows: 1. Teachers' and peers' predication of ADHD students' school adjustment: A. Four categories were found from the teachers' and peers' prediction of ADHD students' school adjustment: learning adjustment, behavior adjustment, interpersonal adjustment and unspecific adjustment. B. Teachers were prone to predict behavior and learning adjustment, while peers were prone to predict learning adjustment. C. Under each category, more details were found. Teachers' and peers' perceptions on ADHD included inattentive, impulsive, hyperactive symptoms and other related problems (such as learning, behavior and interpersonal problems). Teachers and peers predicted more inattention and hyperactivity than impulsivity on ADHD. They all thought that ADHD students performed well in unstructured activity. They also predicted that ADHD students could have more external behavior problems, but ignored the internal behavior problems. 2. Teachers' and peers' perception of social distance on ADHD: A. Eight categories were derived from the Teachers' and peers' perception of social distance on ADHD. Six of them were correspondent: enrolling into class, participating various instructional activity, adjustment in school, help and guidance, understanding the student and unspecific situation. The other two were different. Seeking resource and the arranging instruction were found in the teachers' perceptions, while the peers' interaction and extracurricular activity were found in peer's. B. Teachers were prone to perceive the situation of instruction and guidance while peers were prone to perceive the situation of adjustment in school. C. Under each category more details were found. Teachers and peer were all willing to help ADHD improve the academic adjustment difficulties and accept ADHD participate in unstructured activity however, they were all unwilling to accept ADHD behavior. Teachers needed seek resources to accept ADHD, while peers needed play together in extracurricular activities. 3. Teachers' and peers' perceptions on ADHD label were different, which indicated the perception affected by their own background and different roles. The symbolic interactionism theory was verified by this result. Implications for the practice and the further research were recommended on the basis of the findings. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。