查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 南華大學學生科學倫理傾向研究=The Tendency of Science Ethics for Students of Nanhua University |
---|---|
作者姓名(中文) | 謝青龍; | 書刊名 | 南華通識教育研究 |
卷期 | 1 2004.03[民93.03] |
頁次 | 頁43-70 |
分類號 | 198.3 |
關鍵詞 | 南華大學; 科學倫理; 科學哲學; 測驗工具; Philosophy of science; Science ethics; Test instrument; Nanhua University; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本文從「形上V.S.實踐」、「本質V.S.應用」與「專業V.S.一般」三個角度審視科學倫理的內涵,認為科學倫理的理論內涵,必須回歸倫理與科學在知識、方法、與信念的情境,及個體、社會、與自然的對象,作全面性的考量。依此,本文提出科學的內部與外部倫理二個維度,其中又各自包含九項因素,共計十八項科學倫理的項目。基此,本文更嘗試發展一套科學倫理的問卷測驗,針對南華大學修習通識課程的學生,進行試探性的研究。結果發現:一、在科學的內部倫理項目中,以「實在與真理」與「理性懷疑」被接受的程度最高,外部倫理則以「民主與整合」與「自我實現」最高;二、在性別因素方面,科學的外部倫理有顯著差異(p=0.006);三、在科系類別方面,科學的外部倫理有顯著差異(p=0.034);四、在年級方面,則未達顯著差異;五、在科學學習成績方面,科學的內部倫理有顯著差異(p=0.004)。 |
英文摘要 | This research explores the contents of science ethics from “metaphysical V.S. practical”, “essential V.S. applied”, and “professional V.S. general”. We know: the foundation of science ethics must basics on knowledge, method, belief, individual, society, and nature. Therefore, this research brings up two dimensions: the internal sciences ethics and the external science ethics. The internal sciences ethics includes nine factors, the external science ethics is also nine factors. So, this research tries build up the test instrument of science ethics. And make test to the students of Nan-Hua University in the general education. The result show: first, the internal sciences ethics tend to “reality and truth” and “rational doubt”, and the external science ethics tend to “democracy and integrate” and “self-actualization”. Second, the sex is according to condition of the external science ethics (p=0.006). Third, the category of department is according to condition of the external science ethics (p=0.034). Fourth, the year is not according to both conditions of the external and internal science ethics. Fifth, the achievement of science learn is according to condition of the internal science ethics (p=0.004). |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。