頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 理論建築構造--一個日常性之論述形構的觀點(下)=Making a Theory of Architectural Construction--On the Discursive Formation of Everydayness (Ⅱ) |
---|---|
作 者 | 陳逸杰; | 書刊名 | 文化與建築研究集刊 |
卷 期 | 10 2003.12[民92.12] |
頁 次 | 頁35-56 |
分類號 | 920 |
關鍵詞 | 建築構造; 構成; 倫理; 製作; 技術; 日常性; 論述形構; Architectural construction; Constitution; Ethics; Making; Technology; Everydayness; Discursive formation; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本文是一關乎建築理論的研究,更確切而言,是一種對建築理論的重建。謂之重建,並非憂於提出新的理論,而是意圖指出一種重新探索的可能性。特別是對於建築構造這樣的對象。 傳統的建築取向關心的是形式的表情,而忽略奠基於建築構造上的本質邏輯,以及其所關乎的營造之生產條件。面對這樣的疑旨,本文意圖澄明的是,即使營造論述並非駐足於人類之最初的、知覺的及最後發展的敏感性中,但它其實是與日常性的論述形構息息相關。 雖然建築論述總是藉由形式而展現其所為是,但這樣的形式應該擁有某種構築上的特質;亦即,建築必須是一種透過物質的質料潛在性及可觸知性所產生的特殊形態,並 且是能夠保有營造本質的建築構造。據此,建築論述所尋求而設置於一種適當架構中的事物──建築構造──其實是更指涉著構成的倫理。而這樣的倫理要旨不只是營造構成行為符合寰宇法則的令式,同時也使營造物得以實存。 這一存在於營造論述的思考與行為之間的構成倫理,意味著構成行為的主體性必須是歸結至營造者之活動的意圖。而其所關乎的製作行為應該同時將建築的生產開放涉入於營建構造之技術知識的製作可能性。換言之,技術必須同時在知識範疇的理念與觀點中被關照。 總結對於建築構造之要旨──構成、倫理、製作與技術──的分析可發現,這些要旨其實是指涉著人類建構其生活空間所在的物質基礎,以及其進行空間建構的知實踐;它們並非是順從於先驗的建築風格及樣式,而是關乎一種庇護本質的日常性之論述形構。 |
英文摘要 | The thesis refers to a research of theory that is a reconstructive theory precisely. The thesis does not aim to address a new theory, but attempts to indicate a possibility of re-discovery. The Study mainly relates with architectural construction. The traditional approach of architecture has concerned the appearance of form, thus ignored the essential logic of architectural construction and with reference to the production of building. To confront the problematic, the study would attempt to clarify that the building is not in the sensitivities of everydayness. To be the productive base of figures, examining the architectural construction should unfold with reference to the substantial structure of production. In other words, architecture and building must be brought up, or practiced together. Though the architectural discourse always shows it is by form, but the form should contain a essence of the tectonics, that is, the architecture must be produced a special figuration through the potential of matter and the hostility, and remain the built essence of architectural construction. In this sense, it is architectural construction that is discovered to set a thing by the architectural discourse in the proper framework. And, the architectural construction does not entirely subordinate to the aesthetics, or only purely technical scope, it refers to the ethics of constitution in fact. Such the imperative of ethics makes the constitutional act of constructive parts conform to cosmic law, also makes the building exist. The ethics of constitution that exists between the thinking between the thinking and act of built discourse implies that the subjectivity of constitutional act must refer to the intention of the builder’s activity. The act of making that relates to intention should make the architectural production open with reference to the possibility of creation and imagination of constructional technology knowledge. It actually also implies that the technology must concern in idea and view of the sphere of knowledge. In particular, the definition of technology has to be concerned in the proposition of theory and philosophy. Sum up the themes of architectural construction-constitution, ethics, making and technology, we could understand these themes that actually refer to material base and the practical knowledge of the construction of space. They do not submit to a priori style and type of architecture, but in reference to essence of the shelter that is a discursive formation of everydayness. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。