查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | Forms of Power in Privatizing Welfare State: Politics of Health Care Reform in Taiwan=福利國家私有化與權力的形式:我國全民健康保險改革的政治性 |
---|---|
作 者 | 張世雄; | 書刊名 | 臺灣社會福利學刊 |
卷 期 | 1 2000.09[民89.09] |
頁 次 | 頁1-39 |
分類號 | 412.56 |
關鍵詞 | 權力; 私有化; 自我構成的技術; 福利國家; Power; Privatization; Technologies of the self; Welfare state; |
語 文 | 英文(English) |
中文摘要 | 藉著對社會福利理論暨政策歷史的檢討,本文供一分析架構,來理解當前我國全民健康保險改革的 政治性。論証的要點,是從柷力關係的重組與轉變,來分析當代社會福利私有化的政治作用,而以我國擬議中的健康照顧政策來說明。在權力對象上的重新界定,以及干預模式的重新部署,凱恩斯式福利國家的鉅視柷力運作,自1980年代以來,已逐步為私有化論述的微視柷力運作所替代:由市場和社會領域轉向個體行為作對象;由總體機制的管理轉向個人自我管理的干預策略。對個體行為的誘導,透過個體對自我關係的自我構成技術,來養成有成本利益計算或道德自制力的個體,以降低社會福利的成本和對民主福利國家的負擔。對這種新興統治理性及其權力策略的忽視,註定地導向一自我挫敗的反抗政治。 |
英文摘要 | By examining historical development of theories an policies in social welfare, this paper provides an analytic framework for understanding politics of health care reform in Taiwan. It is argued that political effect of privatizing social welfare and of health care policy reform implicated in the 1996 proposal in particular, must be analyzed from an immediate concern relevant to the process of re-composition and transformation of power relationship. Along dual dimensions of redefinition of the object of power as well as re-deployment of the mode of intervention, macro-power exercising that characterized Keynesian welfare state has been gradually replaced by micro-power exercising in a privatized welfare regime since the 1980s: it is behavioral choices of the individuals rather than market and social sphere as the object of power play; it is self-regulation of one’s consumption behavior instead of coercive intervention into macro-mechanisms as the strategic mode of intervention. In order to implement such a conduct on conduct, technologies of the self performed in terms of one’s relation to one’s self are put into practices to make one’s individuality as cost-benefit calculated or moral self-restrained, and thereby bringing down the volume of social expenditures and its persistent pressure upon democratic-welfare-state. Politics of resistance reactive to welfare privatization would doom to fail by self-defeating since most do not recognize such a new mode of governmental rationality and its strategic re-deployment of power relation. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。