頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 兩性平等教育在大學通識教育課程規劃之研究=Research on Gender Equal Education in the Design of Courses in Universities' General Education |
---|---|
作 者 | 陳芬苓; | 書刊名 | 實踐通識論叢 |
卷 期 | 1 2003.12[民92.12] |
頁 次 | 頁185-205 |
分類號 | 525.45447 |
關鍵詞 | 兩性平等教育; 通識教育; 高等教育; 內容分析法; Gender equal education; General education; Higher education; Content analysis; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 在臺灣,為了推廣性別平等教育,教育部自八十四年起陸續頒訂許多辦法,作為教育部推動兩性平等教育的重要依據,期望能落實兩性平等之教育第策。其實教育具有轉化性別意識的重要功用,尤其在許多非以文法學院為發展重點的學校中,通識課程即成為大專院校中兩性平等教育最主要且重要的媒介,因而本文希望以檢視各大專院校之通識課程為一起點,檢閱現今各大專院校在通識課程上性別意識型態為何?通識課程在性別意識型態上是否已漸漸趨於兩性平等之觀念?抑或仍是傳統的性別角色再複製?以探討大學校園中通識課程在促進兩性平等教育之角色。 本研究以大專院校所開的通識教育課程名稱為研究對象,同時採用「顯性」及「隱性」內容分析法,檢視各大專院校所開的通識教育課程中有關性別的課程之性別意識。結果發現:公立學校每學期平均開設與性別相關的通識課程相對地較私立學校為低,但一般類別的公立學校有更高的比例是探索女性相關的議題,以及在既有的學科領域當中去批判性別的意涵,事實上課程的安排是更偏向傳統性別角色解構的部分。但是屬於「其他」類別的公立學校、「專門/科技」類別與「企業集團支持」背景之私立學校,可能由於其學校發展方向有其特殊性,因此在通識教育開設的課程名稱偏向於傳統性別議題。在本研究當中也發現師範體系中沒有任何一個學校提供兩性平等方面議題或者是提供具批判性、基進性議題的通識教育課程,謙也是在未來的大學的課程規劃當中值得我們值得深入思考的問題。 |
英文摘要 | Since the late 1990s, Department of Education gradually issued many schemes and enacted legislations to promote gender equal education in Taiwan. “Education” is a critical tool to transfer the traditional gender roles towards equal models. Especially for the universities which have no department of humanity or social science, the courses of general education will be the main media to enlighten gender equality. Therefore, this study analyses the course names of general in universities to explore their gender ideologies, and to discuss whether those courses will reproduce or discourse the traditional gender roles in our society. Using both “manifest” and “latent” methods of content analysis, we fond that: (1). the average number of course in public universities is lower than that in private universities. (2). In general public universities, more courses attempt to discuss “women’s issues” and to do gender analysis in certain issues. (3). In “other kinds of public universities” and those private universities with “technological background” or “enterprises supported background,” more courses teach traditional gender topics, such as love, marriage, sex, family etc. (4). No teachers college has any course in general education named “gender equality,” nor discusses critical issues of genders. We worry about how those future teachers can provide gender equal concepts to their students, and will they provide equal opportunities for different genders of students at their future classes. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。