查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- Fenton試劑添加方式對處理ABS廢水之影響
- Fenton法處理PCB電路版酸性廢液之成效與成本分析
- Removal of 2-Chlorophenol from Wastewater Using the Ultrasonic/Fenton Process
- Application of Fenton Process on the Decomposition of 4-Nitrophenol
- 不同pH情況下利用UV/TiO[feaf]分解丙烯腈之初步研究
- Fenton程序處理垃圾滲出水之研究
- Fenton法處理反應性染料之研究
- 氯鹽對Fenton程序去除染料的影響
- 評估藥物最適劑量之跨區域臨床試驗設計策略
- 連續加藥式Sono-Fenton程序降解乙二胺廢水之影響因子探討
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | Fenton試劑添加方式對處理ABS廢水之影響=Effects of Reagent Addition Approaches on the Treatment of Petroleum-Chemical Industrial Wastewater by Fenton Reaction |
---|---|
作 者 | 張家源; 林曜文; 甘鳳琴; 林陳彥; 陳瑞文; | 書刊名 | 嘉南學報. 科技類 |
卷 期 | 29 民92.12 |
頁 次 | 頁213-223 |
分類號 | 445.462 |
關鍵詞 | Fenton程序; ABS廢水; 最適劑量; 試劑添加方式; Fenton precess; ABS wastewater; DCOD; Optimal dosage; Reagent addition approaches; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本研究以實廠ABS製程未經處理之水樣,利用瓶杯試驗進行操作,尋求最佳Fenton法之試劑量及反應時間,反應過程中控制pH=3、室溫30℃。結果顯示Fenton法處理ABS製程廢水其H₂O₂/Fe[fec7]=4000 ppm/2000 ppm、反應時間160min為本實驗之最佳劑量及反應時間。由上述所得最佳劑量及反應時間之結果再進行六種不同方案之操作,利用不同方案對DCOD去除率與H₂O₂剩餘濃度之影響進行比較。方案A:以批次反應加入H₂O₂濃度4000 ppm與Fe[fec7]濃度2000ppm,經快混2 min後持續慢混。方案B:以批次反應加入H₂O₂濃度4000 ppm與Fe[fec7]濃度2000ppm,經快混2 min後持續慢混,最後40min靜置沉澱。方案C:以以批次反應加入H₂O₂濃度4000 ppm與Fe[fec7]濃度2000ppm,全程持續快混。方案D:先加入H₂O₂濃度4000 ppm,再分四個時段將Fe[fec7]逐步加入(每間隔40 min加入Fe[fec7]濃度500 ppm),經快混2 min後持續慢混。方案E:先加入Fe[fec7]濃度2000 ppm,再分四個時段將H₂O₂逐步加入(每間隔40 min加入H₂O₂濃度1000 ppm),經快混2 min後持續慢混。方案F:分四個時段逐步加入H₂O₂與Fe[fec7](每間隔40 min加入H₂O₂濃度1000ppm、Fe[fec7]濃度500 ppm),經快混2 min後持續慢混。由六種方案之實驗結果得知,就整體DCOD去除率之比較上為方案F(73.6%)>方案E(69.4%)>方案D(67.9%)>方案A(62.3%)≈方案B(62.2%)>方案C(57.1%)。研究結果顯示,Fenton試劑添加方式對處理效率有顯著之影響,逐段添加較一次添加高約16%之去除率。過度攪拌如轉速太快或攪拌過久均會降低處理效率。以上研究數據結果,可作為後續實場應用之相關參考依據。 |
英文摘要 | Fenton reaction of petroleum-chemical industrial wastewater was evaluated in this study. This study was mainly focused on the effects of different reagent addition approaches, batch or sequential dose and addition timing, and operating modes on the treatment ofwastewater, DCOD was used as the parameter for the assessment. The pHs of samples were adjusted and fixed at pH 3. Experiments were carried out under room temperature and a jar test apparatus was used. The experiments were conducted in six different operating modes corresponding to various arrangements. For all runs, total dosage of 4000 mg/L Fe[fec7] and 2000 mg/L H₂O₂was added and the total reaction time was 160 minutes. Six different process were noted as follows. A-Fe[fec7] and H₂O₂were together added when Fenton reaction starts. Sample was maintained well mixed at 100 rpm for 2 minutes followed by 30 rpm for 158 minutes. B-Adding Fenton reagent as run A. Sample was maintained well mixed at 100 rpm for 2 minutes followed by 30 rpm for 118 minutes and 40 minutes of settling. C-Adding Fenton reagent as run A. Sample was maintained well mixed at 100 rpm for 160 minutes. D-Fe[fec7] was added when Fenton reaction starts. H₂O₂dosage was added averagely at intervals of 40 minutes (500 mg/L H₂O₂was added for each time). Sample was maintained well mixed as described as A. E-H₂O₂was added when Fenton reaction starts. Fe[fec7] dosage was added averagely at intervals of 40 minutes (1000 mg/L Fe[fec7] was added for each time). Sample was maintained well mixed as described as A. F-Fe[fec7] and H₂O₂were together added averagely at intervals of 40 minutes (500 mg/L H₂O₂and 1000 mg/L Fe[fec7] were added for each time). Sample was maintained well mixed as described as A. The priority of DCOD removal efficiencies was F(73.6%) >E(69.4%)>D(67.9%)>A(62.3%)≒B(62.2%)>C(57.1%). The results revealed that the addition approach of reagent could affect the efficiency of Fenton reaction, the interval addition was with about 16% improvement of removal compared with adding once a time. Excess mixing, including higher agitation speed and prolong mixing time, had no any enhancement but worse the removal efficiency. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。