頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | The Development of Globalization and Sports: Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Theories=體育運動全球化的發展:同質理論和異質理論的不同走向 |
---|---|
作 者 | 吳崇旗; 周靈山; | 書刊名 | Annual Journal of Physical Education and Sports Science |
卷 期 | 3 2003.12[民92.12] |
頁 次 | 頁33-40 |
分類號 | 993.13 |
關鍵詞 | 運動全球化; 全球化; 全球化理論; 同質論和異質論; Globalization; Globalization & sports; Theories on globalization; Homogeneity & heterogeneity; |
語 文 | 英文(English) |
中文摘要 | 「全球化」自1990年代之後,已成為媒體與學界內的主流觀念。無論是社會科學、政治、商業和環保等活動,都一直提及「世界」、「地球」及「全球」的概念。當然,運動做為一種社會現象,也是當今世上最為普遍的流行文化之一,自然無法置身於全球化潮流之外。為了清楚瞭解及詮釋運動全球化的現象,許多專家學者開始建構各種不同的理論。其中,有關全球化的「同質論」(homogeneity)和「異質論」(heterogeneity)兩種論點,一直是探討全球化發展走向的爭議要點。支持同質論觀點的理論包括:「世界體系理論」(World-system Theory),「依賴理論」(Dependency Theory),「文化帝國主義」(Cultural Imperialism);而贊成異質論觀點理論則有:「全球場域」(Global Field)及「全球融合」(Global Mélange)等論調。筆者希望藉由本文中對全球化兩種觀點的理論介紹及其在運動上的實際案例,提供運動全球化走向的清晰輪廓。 |
英文摘要 | Since the late 20th century, globalization has become one of the most important concepts. Experts from the fields of social science, politics, economics, and environmental protection have applied the theme of globalization to their discussions of this changing world. Sport is one of the most universal aspects of popular culture. Thus, when talking about globalization, sport, as one of the major social issues is no exception. In order to conceptualize and explain the phenomena of global sports, many experts have tried to construct their own theories on this issue. Various theories such as, “World-system Theory”, “Dependency Theory”, “Cultural Imperialism”, “Global Field” and “Global Mélange” can be divided into two main categories, homogenous and heterogeneous, to interpret the development and process of globalization in the world of sports. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。