查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 評介《藝術史與階級鬥爭》=Art History and Class Struggle--A Review |
---|---|
作者 | 張舜翔; | 書刊名 | 城市與設計學報 |
卷期 | 15/16 民92.09 |
頁次 | 頁225-250 |
分類號 | 909 |
關鍵詞 | 藝術史; 風格; 意象化意識型態; 認識論模型; 象徵論; Art history; Style; Imaged ideology; Epistemological model; Symbolism; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本文是對哈齊尼可拉之《藝術史與階級鬥爭》一書的評介,共分為三個部分。第一個部分,指出本書作者的問題意識在於:藝術史的主題是什麼?其與階級鬥爭的關係為何?但是,筆者以為,哈齊尼可拉在閱讀視覺文本時存著一個靜態觀點;於是開展了筆者的問題意識:這個靜態觀點形成的認識模型是什麼?在梳理分析對象時,對其論點的影響為何?第二個部分,簡介該書,前半段筆者以阿圖賽的寫作方式為比對,研究哈齊尼可拉建構理論的方法論。後半段,筆者認為本書建構的重要理論就在於:以唯物的「意象化意識形態」以取代唯心的「風格」,以「圖書生產的歷史就是意象化意識形態的歷史」取代「藝術史就是風格史」;最後,指出哈齊尼可拉的關鍵性疏忽是在於對「符徵╱符旨」的多重關係未加梳理,而一個嚴苛的科學式定義化約了其連結的多重方式,而成為單一的絕對關係;迫使其在圖書分析時,滑入了「表意過程」的單一意義。第三部份,旨在指出《藝術史與階級鬥爭》一書中理論建構與應用之間的斷裂。我要闡明此一斷裂並非來自於其分析對象之「具象藝術」與「抽象藝術」的差異,而是來自於:哈齊尼可拉的靜態觀點,在表意過程的兩側起了作用,共同形成其認識論上的「象徵模型」。其作為分析部分具象圖畫的特殊性時,破綻恰巧被主題遮掩,問題並不大,但在分析一般性的圖畫生產過程時,需要再謹慎處理。 |
英文摘要 | This is a review article about Art History and Class Struggle which was written by Nicos Hadjinicolaou. It contains three parts. In the first part, the author's problematique was introduced: "What is the subject-matter of the art history? How to relate to the class struggle?" After criticizing Hadjinicolaou's static viewpoint, I developed a new problematique: "What is the epistemological model formed by such viewpoint? What will be the consequence it caused?" In the second part, a brief introduction to the book was given, including a comparison between Hadjinicolaou's and Louis Althusser's methodology. Coming to a conclusion that the main theory was constructed on a substitution of idealistic "style" by materialistic "imaged ideology", and a substitution of "art history is the history of styles" by "the history of production of pictures is the history of imaged ideology"; and finally identifying a key negligence made by Hadjinicolaou-he careless analyzed the complicated relation between "signifier/signified", but applied a strict scientific definition and then to form a singular connection, so that the "signification" few into one absolute meaning. The third part was intended to show a break between Hadjinicolaou's theory and his application: its source was the static viewpoint that was working the both sides of the signification and resulted in the forming of a "symbolic epistemological model". |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。