查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 社會資本(Social Capital):概念、源起、及現況
- 評:林南(Lin, Nan), Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action (Cambridge, UK ; New York : Cambridge University Press, 2001)
- 以社會資本觀點分析自然景觀變化及權力結構位移現象:以雲林縣林內鄉為例
- Broadening the Concepts of Moore's Transactional Distance Theory in the Light of Relevant Adult Education Theories and the New Telecommunications Technologies
- 臺灣之永續發展--國家與社會的觀點
- 大陸社會動員的理論探索與建構:以「法輪功事件」為例
- 經濟波動:SSA研究途徑的應用
- 從政治學新國家主義論臺灣研究的新趨勢
- 個體自主性與民主--論民主之侷限
- The Importance of the “Exterior” and “Errant Matter”: Louis Althusser's Theoreticism and Self-Criticism Revisited
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 社會資本(Social Capital):概念、源起、及現況=On Social Capital: The Concept, Origins, and Research Trend |
---|---|
作 者 | 王中天; | 書刊名 | 問題與研究 |
卷 期 | 42:5 民92.09-10 |
頁 次 | 頁139-163 |
分類號 | 540 |
關鍵詞 | 社會資本; 蘊含; 自主性; 社會結構; 集體行動的問題; Social capital; Embeddedness; Autonomy; Social structure; Collective action problem; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 「社會資本」在近二十年來已躍然成為一個熱門的分析概念。然而,社會資本在學界受到的重視也對其概念的運用與理論的整合造成困擾。本文企圖從三個不同但卻相關的角度來了解社會資本。首先,筆者嘗試匯集與解讀三位公誤的社會資本理論家對社會資本的闡述並歸納其共同點。其次,筆者從學術與時代背景來探索社會資本的源起。第三,藉由筆者對社會資本定義的蒐集與文獻整理,探討當前社會資本研究領域的特徵。 本文的發現與論點可歸納如下:首先,社會資本是指所有禮含在社會關係內的資源;個體與總體的分析層次分可使用之。其次,由對社會資本概念的源起之探索得知它並不是一個嶄新的概念,而是承繼傳統社會思想並呼應當代歷史發展的產物。再者,當前社會資本的研究文獻中存在兩派不同的研究焦點:其中一派是以社會學家為首,他們關注社會資本在理性個體行動者間的運作;另一派則以政治學者為代表,他們重視社會資本的集體面向。兩派皆對吾人了解社會關係與社會行為有所貢獻,可是二者未來能否整合,前景並不明朗。 |
英文摘要 | 'Social capital' had been very popular analytical concept for the past two decades. However, the growing interest in social capital has also caused a problem regarding the appropriate use of the concept and its theoretical integration. This article intends to review three of the most commonly recognized theorists' ideas on social capital and summarize their similarities. Second, the origins of the concept is researched form both academic and historical background. third, through a survey social capital difinition and literature reviews, the author explores the characteristics of modern social capital research. The findings of this article can be summarized as follows. First, social capital is a resource embedded in social relations. it can be applied to both individual and aggregate levels of analysis. Second, social capital is not a brand new concept, but a product of both traditional social thought and historical development. Third, a theoretical divide exists in the study of social capital. On the one hand, sociologists see social capital operating among rational individuals; on the other hand, political scientists treat social capital as a collectively-owned resource. Both camps contribute to our understanding of social relations and behavior. However, the prospect of integration between the two camps is still not clear. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。