查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 技術標準制定之競爭法規範與調和
- [智慧財產權法專題研討] 由美國不正競爭法之排除適用探討智慧財產權法理念
- 競爭法對智慧財產權市場力量之管制--以有線電視頻道授權案件為例
- 研析美國保護智慧財產權之貿易立法--以一九八八年綜合貿易及競爭法案為例
- 英國暨歐體對競爭法規與智慧財產權法規之執行政策與適用關係
- 從歐洲醫藥產業看競爭法對智慧財產權之限制
- 與談「從歐洲醫藥產業看競爭法對智慧財產權之限制」
- A More Economic and Cross-Jurisdiction Study on Patent Pools
- 歐洲共同體競爭法對技術授權協議之規範
- 從美國法之觀點論智慧財產權於競爭法之定位--兼論我國公平交易法第45條之適用
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 技術標準制定之競爭法規範與調和=A Proposed Antitrust Approach to Industry Standards |
---|---|
作 者 | 李素華; | 書刊名 | 東吳法律學報 |
卷 期 | 15:1 2003.08[民92.08] |
頁 次 | 頁117-178 |
分類號 | 403.3 |
關鍵詞 | 技術標準制定; 合作研發; 智慧財產權; 競爭法; 優勢地位濫用; Standard setting; Research & development collaboration; Intellectual property right; Competition law; Abuse of a dominant position; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 技術標準制定及技術標準制定組織對於經濟發展具有重要影響,特別是在網絡相關產業。透過技術標準,可使上下游業者及消費者獲得足夠訊息,以判斷商品或服務品質之優劣,確定各該商品之安全性;此外,技術標準亦可確保互補性商品或服務之相容性。據此,技術標準制定將使消費者獲益,亦具有促進競爭效果。相反的,技術標準制定亦可能產生限制競爭之不利益,其可能阻礙技術創新,或成為共謀行為的平台;特定專利若被納入技術標準,專利權人將可擴大在特定市場的經濟力量。此等限制競爭效果、濫用技術標準制定程序及智慧財產權之濫用行為,已為近年來重要討論議題。 本文探討重點在於,技術標準制定並非本質上不相容於競爭法。第一及第二部份研析技術標準之重要性與效益、技術標準制定組織之智慧財產權政策、技術標準制定之促進與限制競爭效果。第三部份則探討技術標準制定涉及之競爭法規範,特別是美國、歐盟及德國之競爭法規範;新近重要技術標準制定案件亦一併討論之。最後一部份則為本議題之結論與建議。 |
英文摘要 | Industry standards and standard-setting organizations have been an important feature of the economic landscape, particularly in network industries. Standards provide the information to producers and consumers to enable them to judge the quality of products and services, and also to determine the safety of those products. In addition, standards ensure the compatibility between complementary products and services. For these reasons, industry standards benefit consumers and are substantially procompetitive. On the other hand, standards can also have anti-competitive effects. Industry standards can thwart innovation or provide a forum for collusion. When a patented technology is adopted as a standard, the patent owner enlarges the economic power in the marketplace. The anti-competitive effect, abuse of the standard-setting process and abuse of the intellectual property right are becoming a controversial issue these years. This article contends that industry standards and standard-setting organizations are not fundamentally incompatible with the competition law. Part I and Part II present the importance and the benefits of standards, the intellectual property policy of the standard-setting organizations, the pro- and anti-competitive effects of standards. Part III reviews the antitrust treatment of industry standards, particularly the competition regulations in the U.S., E.U. and Germany. Also in Part III some important cases of standards are covered. Part IV concludes the thesis. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。