頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 「金文編」訂補三例=Three Supplements to Annotated Ancient Inscription |
---|---|
作 者 | 林文華; | 書刊名 | 美和技術學院學報 |
卷 期 | 22:1 2003.04[民92.04] |
頁 次 | 頁24-36 |
分類號 | 793.2 |
關鍵詞 | 金文編; 金文; 古文字; 容庚; 西周銅器; Annotated ancient inscription; Ancient inscription; Ancient text; Jung-Keng; Bronzes of the early chou dynasty; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 容庚先生的文字學巨著《金文編》,向為文字學家從事金文研究必備的工具書,其收字之廣、分部之嚴與隸定之確,大體已得文字學界之公認,咸推為當今最優良的金文字書。所謂「工欲善其事,必先利其器」,運用最新的文字學者的研究成果以及新出的地下文字資料,來檢視《金文編》的收字分部正確與否,也成為促進金文研究不可或缺的重要工作。有鑑於此,本文乃針對《金文編》之中少部分的疏漏,提出一些訂補意見,並就教於學者。 |
英文摘要 | Masterpiece of philology Annotated Ancient Inscription authored by Mr. Jung Keng has always been an indispensable reference book for philologists that engage in research on ancient inscriptions. It is widely acclaimed as one of the most outstanding reference books on ancient inscriptions; philologists recognize the extensive collection, well-defined division and accurate definition of this book. As the proverb goes, "Good tools are prerequisite to the successful execution of a job." Examining the accuracy of inclusion in Annotated Ancient Inscription through using the findings of contemporary philologists and texts that were recently excavated has been regarded as an indispensable work to promoting the research on ancient inscriptions. In view of this, in this article revisions are presented in regard to omissions and inaccuracies in Annotated Ancient Inscription. Scholastic advice is welcome. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。