查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 臺灣各縣市多層面生活品質的衡量=Measuring Multidimensional Quality of Life across Taiwan Cities |
---|---|
作 者 | 陳宏易; 黃俊彥; | 書刊名 | 東吳經濟商學學報 |
卷 期 | 40 2003.03[民92.03] |
頁 次 | 頁71-97 |
分類號 | 542.5 |
關鍵詞 | 多層面生活品質指標; 主成份分析法; 特徵價格法; Box-Cox線性轉換; Multidimensional approach of quality of life index; Principle component; Hedonic prices approach; Box-Cox transformation; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 過去研究台灣各縣市的生活品質指標大多以房租和 (或) 工資來作為生活品質的被解釋變數,並以單一方法 (如特徵價格法) 來衡量。本文參考並改進Slottje (1991) 的架構來建立台灣省各縣市以及台北市和高雄市在民國87年的多層面生活品質指標 (multidimensional quality of life index) 。本文和過去研究台灣各縣市生活品質指標的不同之處如下:第一、同時還取「每坪租金」、「粗死亡率」、以及「平均每人門診醫療費用申報金額」三種變數作為衡量生活品質的被解釋變數。第二、以Box-Cox一次線性轉換函數來改進Slottje (1991) 多層面生活品質指標在函數形態的限制。第三、本文除了使用傳統的特徵價格法外,也使用主成份分析法。從實證的結果我們發現以「每坪租金」作為被解釋變數的排名,租金較高的縣 (市) 其生活品質排名亦較高;但以「平均每人門診醫療費用申報狀況金額」為被解釋變數,「租金」排名中較佳的縣市,其個人醫療支出亦較高,但該縣市的生活品質排名反而較差。綜合三組「特徵價格法」的各縣市生活品質總排名則以桃園縣最佳,台東縣最差。而以主成份法衡量生活品質的部份,以台北市最佳,澎湖縣最差。最後,以結合三組特徵價格法和主成份分析法所得到的各縣市多層面生活品質指標的最終排名,則以台北市最佳,澎湖縣最差。 |
英文摘要 | We adapt Slottje's (1991) multidimensional approach to measure the quality of life across 23 Taiwan cities in 1998. The main differences between this paper and existing literatures are as follows: Firstly, three explained variables are chosen. They are housing rents per acre, gross death rate, and average cost per visit of medical care. Secondly, the Box-Cox linear transformation is applied to enhance the limitation of functiona1 forms in Slottje's (1991) multidimensional approach of quality of life index. Thirdly, besides traditional hedonic price approach, we use princip1e component approach as well. The empirical results indicate that the cities or counties with higher quality of life raking by using "housing rents per acre" as explained variable, their housing rents are also higher. Using the hedonic price approach, we find that Taoyuan County is the highest in the overall ranking and Taitung County is the worst. Applying principle component approach, Taipei City has the highest raking and Penghu County has the worst. Finally, the overall ranking of quality of life by multidimensional approach indicates that Taipei City has the highest quality of life ranking and Penghu County has the lowest quality of life ranking. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。