頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 行道樹景觀美質評估方法之研究=Study on the Methods of Evaluating the Scienic Beauty of Street Trees |
---|---|
作 者 | 林晏州; | 書刊名 | 造園學報 |
卷 期 | 8:2 2002.12[民91.12] |
頁 次 | 頁67-93 |
分類號 | 435.79 |
關鍵詞 | 行道樹; 景觀美質評估法; 景觀美質評值; 偏好; Street trees; Scenic beauty estimation method; Scenic beauty estimates; Preference; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本研究主要目的在於以行道樹種景觀美質之評估為例,進行各種景觀評估方法之比較。研究結果摘要如下:(1)可利用幻燈片及相片評估民眾對行道樹之偏好,但拍攝方向(橫拍或直拍)與拍攝位置不同時,會影響受測者對一些照片景觀之偏好程度。因此未來應針對評估照片最適當的拍攝方式再深入研究。(2)各受測組之原始景觀評值經檢定結果具顯著差異,唯當將其轉換成景觀美質評值(SBEs)後,各組間之景觀美質評值高度正相關。此結果顯示景觀美質評估法(Scenic Beauty Estimation Method)能有效消除受測者評估尺度之差異。(3)學生組與專業者及一般市民受測者之景觀美質評值高度正相關,此結果顯示過去許多研究利用學生進行景觀評估,並以其結果代表一般市民之偏好,並無不妥之處。 |
英文摘要 | The purpose of this study was to compare difference among methods of landscape esthetics evaluation. Some important findings of this study are summarized as follows: 1.The slides and photographs are reliable stimuli for measuring public preference for street trees. The direction and position of taking pictures, however, make some differences on preference for some pictures. This result suggests that more studies are necessary to examine the appropriate way of taking picutures. 2.There exist significant differences among respondent groups when comparing the preference. The SBEs of those pictures measured from different respondent groups are positively and highly correlated. It suggests that the criterion difference among respondents can effectively be adjusted to the same rating scale by the Scenic Beauty Estimation method. 3.The revealed high correlation among SBEs of student groups, professional group, and citizen group justified previous approach to measure students' landscape preferences as public preferences. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。