頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 書評:蘇珊.列芬《重返哲學與詩之間的古老爭執--柏拉圖與希臘的文學傳統》=Critical Book Review: Susan B. Levin, «The Ancient Quarrel between Philosophy and Poetry Revisited--Plato and the Greek Literary Tradition» |
---|---|
作 者 | 何畫瑰; | 書刊名 | 臺大文史哲學報 |
卷 期 | 57 民91.11 |
頁 次 | 頁223-232 |
分類號 | 141.4 |
關鍵詞 | 柏拉圖; 克拉梯樓斯; 名稱; 哲學與詩的爭執; Plato; The Cratylus; Name; The quarrel between philosophy and poetry; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本文試圖為蘇珊‧列芬新作進行書評。蘇珊. 列芬從柏拉圖語言哲學延伸出新的觀點,重新處理哲學典詩之間的爭執。進路新穎,卻有相當高的可行性,達到很好的成果。但本書中,詭辯術或其他哲學觀點僅僅被視為這篇對話的非主要對手,似乎並不恰當。此外,作者最具有獨創性的兩項論點,仍值得商榷:一、關於「正確名稱」指涉對象的說明;二、作者協調《理想國》第二、三卷及第十卷的辦法。就第一點,本文質疑這套正確名稱的說法是否能適用於專名;就第二點,則以柏拉圖詩論中的「模仿」問題加以檢視。期能對本書提供一項批判性討論的可能。 |
英文摘要 | This piece reviews Levin's new work. Levin develops her study of Plato's philosophy of language. With such a new study, she revisits the quarrel between philosophy and poetry. This book achieves some worthy results. Yet the significant role of the sophistry seems to escape Levin's notice. Besides, I argue with her for two points: First, she states a good explanation for the referents of correct names, while it needs a further explanation whether this can work in the cases of proper names. Second, she tries to show the consistence of the Republic II, III and X, while I doubt whether this attempt can face Plato's strong position against mimesis in poetry. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。