頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 國小數學課程本位測量電腦題庫系統之發展及其信效度研究--用以評量學習障礙兒童=A Study of Computerized Mathematics CBM System for the Assessment of Students with Learning Disabilities: Development, Reliability and Validity |
---|---|
作者 | 崔夢萍; 朱慧娟; Tsuei, Mengping; Chu, Hui-chuan; |
期刊 | 臺北市立師範學院學報 |
出版日期 | 20021200 |
卷期 | 33 2002.12[民91.12] |
頁次 | 頁281-308 |
分類號 | 523.3431 |
語文 | chi |
關鍵詞 | 課程本位測量; 電腦題庫系統; 學習障礙; 國小數學; Curriculum-based measurement; Computerized item bank system; Learning disabilities; Elementary mathematics curriculum; |
中文摘要 | 本研究旨在(l)發展與建置標準化之課程本位測量(curriculum-based measurement, CBM)電腦題庫系統;(2)運用描述統計探討電腦課程本位測量題庫系統之題目分佈情形,藉以探究國小數學課程結構;(3)以臺北市某國小資源班數學學習障礙學生為施測對象,運用本研究所發展之系統每週編製2份CBM計算概念之測量卷,為期一學期共30份CBM測量卷,據此進行探討電腦題庫系統隨機選題機制之穩定性;(4)以臺北市某國小四、五年級學生共63人為施測對象,以其CBM的分數作為檢定課程本位測量電腦題庫系統信度與效度之依據。研究結果發現:(1)國小數學課程第七冊與第九冊計算題目在各單元之分配比例極為不均,介於.33%~23%之間,尤以第九冊較為明顯。(2)CBM電腦題庫系統在隨機選題的模組相當穩定,在30份的CBM評量卷中,92%-97%的題目出現頻率介於0-5次之間,且涵蓋該冊所有單元目標。(3)CBM之複本信度介於.63-.76之間(p<.01);效度分析結果發現CBM測驗與數學能力診斯測驗的相關介於.60-.84之間(p<.01);CBM測驗與數學月考成績之相關介於.40-.75之間(p<.05)。故本研究所發展之國小數學課程本位測量電腦題庫系統不僅符合隨機化選題原則,更為一具有良好信、效度之評量工具。 |
英文摘要 | The purposes of the study were to: (a) develop a computerized curriculum-based measurement (CBM) item bank system and analyze the distributions of mathematics computation problems in CBM system, (b) investigat the random-selecting module of the CBM test, generated from CBM system for students with learning disabilities, (c) establish the reliability and validity of the CBM system by analyzing thirty CBM and validity of the CMB system. The subjects were sixty-three students in Grades 4 and 5. The results of this study were: (a) Every unit objective in elementary mathematics curriculum contains. 33% to 23% of computation problems in volume 7 and 9. Results indicated the unbalanced distribution of problems in each unit objective, especially in volume 9. (b) In 30 CBM computation tests, which generated from CBM system, 92% of problems were random-selected 0-5 times by CBM system. And, all of the unit objectives were included in 30 CBM tests. (c) Results supported the reliability (.63-.76, p<0.1) and the validity (.48-.84, p<.05) of the CBM system, and also indicated the adequacy of the computerized CBM system. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。