頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 佛教「般若」與莊子「齊物」異同論=A Comparison between the Prajnaparamita of Buddhism and the Equality of Zhuangzi |
---|---|
作 者 | 蔡宏; | 書刊名 | 哲學與文化 |
卷 期 | 29:11=342 2002.11[民91.11] |
頁 次 | 頁1009-1014+1060 |
專 輯 | 佛學專題 |
分類號 | 221.4、221.4 |
關鍵詞 | 無我; 智慧; 道; 認識主體; Emptiness of oneself; Wisdom; Dao; The center of knowledge; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 文章對佛教與莊子的認識論思想,從四個方面比較了它們觀點的相同和差異之處。莊子說人在認識事物時,應當放棄自我執著和主觀成見,不從自己的價值中心出發,對事物進行價值判斷,超越這個世界的相對性,達到對這個世界統一性的認識。佛教則講人在認識世界時,應當以無分別的智慧,破除對我的執著和對世間事物的種種價值判斷,從而達到對佛教中道的認識。這是它們相一致的地方。然而莊子從認識的相對性出發,從相對主義走向了虛無主義,否定了現實人生的意義和價值。而佛教從緣起理論出發,兼顧了空和有,他們主張在現實世界中以無我的智慧去為眾生作出奉獻,從而走上了與莊子截然不同的人生道路。這是他們的相異之處。 |
英文摘要 | In terms of four aspects, the paper compares the differences between the epistemologies of Buddhism and Zhuangzi. Zhuangzi said that when a person thinks about the world, he should not think and judge the world subjectively but move beyond the relativity; then he will be able to see the truth. Buddhism said if a person understands the world throught the prajnaparamita wisdom, he would find out that he does not exist and that his judgment of the world is meaningless. In this way, he can see the meaning of Dao in Buddhism. This idea is what they have in common. From his relative point of view, Zhuangzi turned away from relativism to nihilism, seeing the world as meaningless. The Buddhist theory of conditional causation draws attention to the empty and the existing, so Buddhists think that a person should make use of their wisdom to make some contribution for people. This is the difference between the two theories. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。