查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 價值形式與統治形式--對社會契約論的一個馬克思式的理解=Value-forms and Governance-forms--A Marxian Understanding of the Theory of Social Contract |
---|---|
作 者 | 孫善豪; | 書刊名 | 政治與社會哲學評論 |
卷 期 | 2 2002.09[民91.09] |
頁 次 | 頁47-83 |
分類號 | 549.4 |
關鍵詞 | 價值形式; 統治形式; 馬克思; 魯濱遜; 霍布斯; 洛克; 盧梭; Value-form; Governance-form; Marx; Robinson Crusoe; Hobbes; Locke; Rousseau; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本文的主要論點有四:1.馬克思的四種價值形式,蘊含了四種統治形式;2.四種統治形式,又分別適應於笛福、洛克、霍布斯與盧梭關於社會或社會契約的論述;3.由於四種價值形式與統治形式是一個發展的整體,因此,當社會契約理論被納入這個發展整體來理解時,它們也就被「模式化J'而成為一個發展的序列;4.這個發展的序列不同於歷史的序列,因為在這個序列中,霍布斯被認為是洛克理論的進一步發展,而盧梭的理論則是霍布斯理論的倒退。此外,一個隱藏並有待進一步討論的課題是:如果馬克思提出價值形式是為了取消價值,那麼統治形式的提出是否也指向統治的消除?若是,則它如何可能? |
英文摘要 | There are four main arguments in this essay: 1.Marx's four valueforms imply four governance-forms, 2. the latter are suited to the discourses of social dimension of Defoe, Locke, Hobbes and Rousseau. 3. Since the value-forms and governance-forms are both a totality of development, the theories of social contract are “modelized"as a series of development in so far as they were understood in such way. 4. This series is different to a historical one: Hobbes' theory would be taken as an advance of Locke's, and Rousseau's theory as a degradation of Hobbes'. In addition, there is still another thesis hidden in this essay. If Marx's formation of value-form is to abolish value, does it mean to abolish goverance when the goverance-form was established? If the answer is yes, how is it possible? This thesis is to be further developed. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。