查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 原住民大學生生涯發展狀況、生涯自我效能與其生涯阻礙因素之關係研究
- 原住民大學生生涯發展狀況、生涯自我效能與生涯阻礙因素之關係研究
- 生涯自我效能及其相關因素對大學生生涯選擇影響之徑路分析
- 社會認知生涯理論之興趣模式驗證研究
- 生涯諮商介入策略對國中學生認知複雜度與生涯自我效能的影響
- A Comparative Study on Career Self-Efficacy and Perceptions of Career Decision-Making among Secondary Students with Gifts/Talents, Those with both Gifts/Talents and Learning Disabilities, and Those with Learning Disabilities
- 大學校院餐旅管理系學生生涯自我效能與生涯阻礙關係之研究
- 實施九年一貫課程後國民小學教師生涯自我效能與生涯協助需求相關因素之研究
- 航輪相關科系學生生涯自我效能與生涯堅持之探討
- 角色楷模學習輔導方案應用於科技領域大學生之成效研究
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 原住民大學生生涯發展狀況、生涯自我效能與生涯阻礙因素之關係研究=The Study of the Relationship among Career Development Status, Career Self-Efficacy, and Career Barrier Factors in Aboriginal Undergraduates |
---|---|
作 者 | 李詠秋; 高淑芳; | 書刊名 | 初等教育學報 |
卷 期 | 8 2002.07[民91.07] |
頁 次 | 頁41-66 |
分類號 | 529.9 |
關鍵詞 | 原住民大學生; 生涯發展狀況; 生涯自我效能; 生涯阻礙因素; Aboriginal graduates; Career development status; Career self-efficacy; Career barrier factors; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本研究的目的在了解不同性別、就讀不同年級之原住民與非原住民大學生的生涯有展狀況與生涯自我效能是否有所不同;而他們對生涯阻礙因素的看法是否也有顯著的差異性。又,生涯發展狀況、生涯自我效能及生涯阻礙因素三者之間的相互關係在原住民與非原住民大學生身上是否一致。 本研究以北區八所公私立大學院校之原住民與非原住民大學生各150名為受試對象,經由受試者在「生涯發展狀況量表」、「生涯自我效能量表」及「生涯阻礙因素量表」上的口應情形以變異數分析、相關分析進行考驗。 本研究結果的主要發現有:(1)大學生對其生涯發展狀況(含生涯定向、生涯探索)的回應隨著年級的增加而提高,且此趨向並未因族群或性別的不同而有所差異。(2)大學生對解決未來生涯相督議題的信心程度(即生涯自我效能)則不受其族群、性別或年級的差異而有明顯的不同。(3)原住民大學生比非原住民大學生較認為族群角度會阻礙其生涯發展,而較不認為方向選擇或學習困擾會對其生涯發展有所阻礙;大學男生比大學女生傾向認為科系選擇、學習狀況、學習困擾會阻礙其生涯發展。(4)大學生的生涯自我效能與各生涯阻疑因素皆與其生涯發展狀況間有顯著相關,且其關係結構在原住民大學生身上及在非原住民大學生身上相當一致;除了族群角色阻礙與發狀況、生涯自我效能之間的相關在原住民大學生是身上顯著的,但在非原住民大學生身上卻不顯著。 |
英文摘要 | The main purpose of this study is to investigate possible differences between aboriginal and non-aboriginal undergraduates in career development status, career self-efficacy, and career barrier factors. It is also aimed to examine if the relationship among career development status, career self-efficacy, and career barrier factors is consistence in aboriginal undergraduates with in non-aboriginal undergraduates. There were 300 subjects sampled from eight universities of the north area in Taiwan, in which 150 subjects for each of aboriginal and non-aboriginal undergraduates. All subjects were asked to respond to all of the “Career Development Status Scale,” “Career Self-Efficacy Scale,” and “Career Barrier Factors Scale”. The obtained data were analyzed by MANOVA, correlation analysis and multiple regression analysis. The main findings of the study are as follows: (1) Undergraduates responded their career development status (include career identity and career explore) increased as a function of their grades in college with no race and sex difference effects. (2) No race, sex, and grade differences were found in undergraduates’ career self-efficacy. (3) Aboriginal undergraduates perceived more racial barriers, but less direct selection barriers and learning problem barriers than non-aboriginal undergraduates. On the other hand, male undergraduates reacted more subject selection barriers, and learning problem barriers than female undergraduates. (4) The correlations among career development, career self-efficacy, and career barrier factors in undergraduates were fond statistical significant. Generally, The structure of the relationship among the three Scales is consistence in aboriginal with in non-aboriginal undergraduates, except for the racial barrier factor was significantly related to aboriginal undergraduates’ career identity and career self-efficacy but to non-aboriginal undergraduates’. (5) Aboriginal undergraduates’ career identity can be predicated 71% by their direct selection barriers, hesitate action barriers, subject selection barriers, and career self-efficacy. Yet, aboriginal undergraduates’ career explore can be predicated 76% by their information search barriers, career self-efficacy, direct selection barriers, characteristics expression barriers, and racial barriers. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。