查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- Subjectivity and History in Don DeLillo's Libra
- 主體、科技與塞爆空間:季普森之電腦龐克三部曲與後現代文化之敍述危機
- 時間與組織
- The Appropriation of Postmodernism in Feminist Discourses
- The Marginalized Strike Back: Black Feminism on Postmodern Issues--Anti-essentialism, Identity Politics, High Theory
- 知者無罪:海登懷特的歷史哲學
- 歷史書寫、主體性與權力:對「排灣人寫排灣族歷史」的觀察與反思
- A Postmodern Reading of Life of Pi
- 戰後臺灣小說中「將軍書寫」初探
- 後現代,還是後殖民?:《微醺彩妝》中的景觀、歷史書寫以及跨國與本土的辯證
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | Subjectivity and History in Don DeLillo's Libra=論德利羅小說《天秤座》中的主體與歷史書寫 |
---|---|
作 者 | 林建光; | 書刊名 | 興大人文學報 |
卷期 | 32(上) 民91.06 |
頁次 | 頁391-427 |
分類號 | 874.57 |
關鍵詞 | 天秤座; 後現代; 主體; 歷史書寫; Libra; The postmodern; Subjectivity; History writing; |
語文 | 英文(English) |
中文摘要 | 許多批評家認為德利羅的《天秤座》是一本很成功的後現代小說。在人物刻劃方面,小說將角角Lee Harvey Oswald視為社會機制、意識型態、以及各種論述生產的產物,本身缺乏自主或主體性。在歷史書寫方面,批評家們指陳《天秤座》解構小說與歷史的差異,並體現「歷史即小說」這個後現代的基本命題。本文目的在於指類後現代閱讀的不足與盲點,進而對其提出修正。前半部皆探應後現代主體問題,後半部分則強調歷史的小說性及真實性。 |
英文摘要 | Don DeLillo’s Libra has been widely acclaimed as a masterpiece of postmodern fiction. Its depiction of Lee Harvey Oswald as a socially constructed subject, as well as its questioning of the distinction between the two genres of history and fiction, makes the novel conform fairly well to postmodern notions of ambivalence, intertexuality, and death of the subject. Examining Libra in a more critical manner, this paper appraises not only the strengths of the novel but also its limitations. The problematic of subjectivity is discussed in the first section and that of postmodern history in the second. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。