查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 交易成本與組織能力觀點的比較與整合=A Synthesis of Transaction Cost and Organizational Competence Perspectives of the Firm |
---|---|
作 者 | 黃延聰; | 書刊名 | 中山管理評論 |
卷 期 | 10:2 民91.夏 |
頁 次 | 頁261-289 |
分類號 | 553.5 |
關鍵詞 | 廠商理論; 交易成本; 組織能力; 廠商疆界; Theory of the firm; Transaction cost; Organizational competence; Organizational capability; Firm boundary; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 由Coase與Williamson所發展的交易成本經濟,將廠商視為交易的統治體制,以「有限理性」與「投機主義」做為基本假設來解釋廠商的存在與疆界的決定;關心的是廠商交換活動所產生的投機問題。而由演化經濟、資源基礎觀點及知識基礎觀點所發展,以組織能力為基礎的廠商理論,則是將廠商視為知識儲存的體系,而以「有限理性」與「知識基礎不同」兩個基本假設來解釋廠商的存在與疆界的決定;著重在廠商生產活動所衍生的協調問題。本文旨在比較交易成本與組織能力觀點的思想根源、基本假設與廠商理論,並分析兩觀點之問的對話與論戰。最後提出一個整合兩觀點的廠商疆界分析模式,強調經濟組織疆界的決定不僅要降低統治成本,也需要考慮創造獨特的生產價值。 |
英文摘要 | Transaction cost (TC) economics, developed by Coase and Williamson, argued firm is the governance institution of transactions. Based on ‘bounded rationality’ and ‘opportunism’ behavioral assumptions, TC perspective explained the existence and the boundaries of the firm, focusing opportunism problem of economic exchange activities. However, Organizational competence (OC) perspective, developed by evolutionary economics, resource-based and knowledge-based view, asserted firm is the repository of knowledge. Based on ‘bounded rationality’ and ‘differentknowledge specialization’ assumptions, OC perspective provided the explanation of existence and boundaries of firms, focusing coordination problem of firm production. This article compares the two approaches to the theory of the firm, analyzing the arguments between scholars of the two perspectives. Accordingly, the economic analysis model of firm boundary involving a conjoint evaluation of both governance cost and production value is proposed. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。