查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- Teachers College Faculty Attitudes toward Student Ratings: The Comparison between Required Policy and Optional Policy
- Faculty and Student Attitudes toward Student Ratings of Instruction
- Student Perceptions of Student Ratings of Instruction: Does School Policy Really Matter?
- The Effect of Subject Area and Instructor Gender on Student Ratings of Instruction
- Student Ratings: What are Hualien Teacher College Students Telling Us?
- An Application of Regression Models with Student Ratings in Determining Course Effectiveness
- 師範學院與非師範學院教師對「學生評鑑教師教學」態度之比較
- Results of Student Ratings: Does Faculty Attitude Matter?
- Faculty Attitude towards Student Ratings: Do the Resultant Ratings Scores Matter?
- The Validity and Reliability of Student Ratings: Comparison between Paper-pencil and Online Survey
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | Teachers College Faculty Attitudes toward Student Ratings: The Comparison between Required Policy and Optional Policy=師院教師對「學生評鑑教師教學」態度之研究:全校實施與各系自定之比較 |
---|---|
作 者 | 張德勝; | 書刊名 | 屏東師院學報 |
卷 期 | 16 2002.03[民91.03] |
頁 次 | 頁205-229 |
分類號 | 522.29 |
關鍵詞 | 學生評鑑教師教學; 大學教師評鑑; 學校政策; 師範學院; Student ratings of instruction; Faculty evaluation; School policy; Teachers college; |
語 文 | 英文(English) |
中文摘要 | 本研究主要目的是探討學校對於「學生評鑑教師教學」的實施政策是否會影響師院教師對「學生評鑑教師教學」的態度。學校政策大致分為兩種,第一種是學校全面實施,第二種是由各系所教師自行決定。研究樣本為臺灣地區九所師範學院八十七學年度第二學期456位專任教師。研究工具為研究者自編之「教師對「學生評鑑教師教學」態度問卷」,共包含六個議題及一題整體性意見。六個議題分別為評鑑的目的、對評鑑的關注、評鑑的內容、評鑑的負面影響、評鑑的應用以及評鑑的程序。研究結果發現全校實施的學校教師和各系自行決定的學校教師都同意學校應該實施「學生評鑑教師教學」,但是在評鑑的目的、對評鑑的關注、評鑑的內容、評鑑的負面影響、評鑑的應用等評鑑議題上,則兩種不同政策的教師,有顯著的差異。至於評鑑的程序方面,則兩種不同政策的教師,觀點都頗為一致。 |
英文摘要 | The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of administration systems (either mandated by the school or optional) on faculty attitudes toward student ratings. The sample included 456 faculty members in teachers colleges in Taiwan, during the 1999 spring semester. The data was collected by a 42-item survey questionnaire entitled Questionnaire for Faculty Attitudes toward Student Ratings. The results indicate some statistically significant differences in perceptions between the two groups along with many points of agreement. The areas under consideration include the purposes, concerns, and components of student ratings. There is no statistical mean difference to be found in the negative effects, the application of ratings, and overall agreement across the two groups. Irrespective of whether the school policy mandates the evaluation or not, faculty agree with the following: (1) All instructors should accept the policy of conducting student ratings, (2) The current students should be the raters, (3) Faculty evaluation committees should be responsible for developing the evaluation form, (4) A department-wide evaluation forshould be used for student ratings instead of a college-wide evaluation form, (5) The best time to implement student ratings is at the end of the semester, (6) The evaluation process is best conducted in the classroom, and (7) The classroom chairman should be the person to take charge of the evaluation. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。