查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- On Nominalizations in Paiwan
- Nominalization in Pazih
- Nominalization in Mantauran (Rukai)
- Nominalization in Tsou
- Nominalization in Kavalan
- Nominalization of Interrogatives in Kucapungan Rukai
- On Negative Constructions in Paiwan
- A Note on Paiwan tj, dj, and lj
- Two Types of Classifier Languages: A Typological Study of Classification Markers in Paiwan Noun Phrases
- The Segment /w/ and Contrastive Hierarchy in Paiwan and Seediq
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | On Nominalizations in Paiwan=排灣語的名物化 |
---|---|
作 者 | 湯志真; | 書刊名 | 語言暨語言學 |
卷 期 | 3:2 2002.04[民91.04] |
頁 次 | 頁283-333 |
分類號 | 803.9961 |
關鍵詞 | 名物化; 結果名詞; 動名詞; 關係子句; 排灣語; 臺灣南島語; Nominalization; Result nouns; Gerunds; Relativization; Paiwan; Formosan languages; |
語 文 | 英文(English) |
中文摘要 | 本篇文章主要是提討排灣語的「名物化」。就「結果名詞」的產生而言,有證據顯示可分為在「詞彙層次」衍生和在「句法層次」衍生兩種不同的名物化。這兩種「結果名詞」,在句法行為語意行為上,都與「無中心語關係子句」和「內附中心語關係子句」有所不同。排灣語類的語言之所以有「句法層次」的「名物化」,可能是因為這類的「名物化」對「詞幹」和「焦點標記」有共存限制的要求。這樣的語料和分析,將對Chomsky (1995)所提出的”不允許「詞綴」在「句法層法」依附”的主張造成問題。 |
英文摘要 | Paiwan exhibits two kinds of nominalization yielding result nouns: the first takes place at the morphological level, the second at the syntactic. Both types of nominal should be distinguished from headless or internally-headed relatives in Paiwan. That the nominalization of result nouns takes place at the syntactic level in languages like Paiwan may be due to the fact that focus/voice markers are required in this kind of nominalization. If so, this would appear to be problematic for Chomsky’s (1995) claim that verbal affixation does not occur at the S-Structure. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。