查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 以「史」為學與以「歷史」為學
- 國家與社會研究的再思考:以臺灣近代史為例
- 我所知道的何炳棣先生
- 羅素論西方四位大史學家
- 從歷史學科課程評析英國國定課程改革之理論與實際
- 評Keith Jenkins: «On “What is History”: From Carr and Elton to Rorty and White»
- 「國內歷史學學術期刊排序計畫」簡介
- Educational Reform Act-Based Curriculum Innovation: An English Experience of National Curriculum Reform
- 新史學及其在社會學上之應用
- 史學家的胸襟
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 以「史」為學與以「歷史」為學="Narrative" as Discipline vs. "Historical Narrative" as Discipline |
---|---|
作 者 | 李紀祥; | 書刊名 | 華岡文科學報 |
卷 期 | 23 1999.12[民88.12] |
頁 次 | 頁201-218 |
分類號 | 601 |
關鍵詞 | 史學; 歷史學; 近代史; 近代意識; Shi hsueh; Li-shi hsueh; Modern history; Modern consciousness; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 現行新制學堂中,既有「歷史」為名之學系,亦有以「史」為名之學系,稱名雖 異,其課程卻實同之現象,正反映一深值探索之敘事已蘊其中。 本文擬欲就近代意識入手 ,揭視「近代史」原為一種中西與古今座標失衡下之產物;在此之外,更可以有他種敘事之 可能。不同之起源論述,總是見證著不同之現在;而觀自我之過去狀態,亦非僅祇有一種「 歷史」版本。因之以「史」為學與以「歷史」為學,總是須反省自己是否已在某種版本牢籠 之中。 |
英文摘要 | In current new-style schools, there are departments of "historical narrative" (li-shi, 歷史 ) and ones of "narrative"(shi, 史 ). Yet, different names make no difference to curriculum, which truly deserves a true reflection upon the existence of the concept of "narrative" as embedded in the new-style curriculum design. This paper attempts to go with and through modem consciousness of this, looking to it that, "modem history" is originally a result of spheric unbalance. East and West, Ancient and Modem. Also, it is a "narrative" of other species. Discourses upon the origin witness difference in contemporality; and, reflection upon the subject in the past proves "histories" in difference. Consequently, be it in the discipline of "narrative" or in that of "historical narrative", as caged is always the subject as reflected in "histories". |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。