查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 文化傳承與社會批判--回顧Apel, Habermas, Gadamer, Ricoeur間的詮釋學論爭
- 詮釋學論爭在爭什麼:理解對話或爭議析辯?--高達美與阿佩爾兩種取徑的評比
- 藝術教學中高達美詮釋學與批判理論之整合應用--以孟克《青春期》為例
- 理解的普遍過程:高達美詮釋學中的七個關鍵字
- 詮釋學之為倫理學?--高達美[Hans-Georg Gadamer]《真理與方法》中應用概念之簡介
- 普通教育學方法探究
- 報告書寫的困境與可能性--寫給愛好質化研究的朋友
- 當代教育思潮 (現象學、詮釋學、批判理論) 在比較教育方法論上的應用
- 詮釋學循環:史萊瑪赫、海德格和高達美
- 論高達美詮釋學的文本與詮釋之統一性
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 文化傳承與社會批判--回顧Apel, Habermas, Gadamer, Ricoeur間的詮釋學論爭=The Continuity of Tradition and the Criticisms on the Social--The Controversies between Gadamer, Apel, Habermas and Ricoeur Reconsidered |
---|---|
作 者 | 張鼎國; | 書刊名 | 國立政治大學哲學學報 |
卷 期 | 5 1999.01[民88.01] |
頁 次 | 頁57-75 |
分類號 | 143.89 |
關鍵詞 | 高達美; 阿佩爾; 哈伯馬斯; 呂克爾; 詮釋學; 批判理論; 意識型態批判; 傳統; 權威; 反思; 詮釋學經驗; Gadamer, Hans-Georg; Apel, Karl-Otto; Habermas, Jurgen; Ricoeur, Paul; Hermeneutics; Critical theory; Critique of ideology; Tradition; Authority; Reflection; Hermeneutic experience; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本篇論文基本上是回顧性處理曾發生於歐陸四大思想家Gadamer、Apel、Habermas、 和Ricoeur之間的,關於詮釋學與意識型態批判理論的若干爭論,探討其間兩方的主要歧異, 及其對各自日後的哲學進路之決定性形響。但由於篇幅和時間的限制,本文探索的重點先放 置在哲學詮釋學與批判理論早期往復相質疑的論述條理上,盡可能參閱第一手的討論資料, 以釐清雙方各自所重的哲學目標與學術企圖,作為比較其思想差異的對照標準,因而時間上 則暫以Ricoeur和Gadamer二人發生於1982年的相關對話為止,如此經由Ricoeur調和仲介 的立場比對下,正好可以明確顯見出本文觀察考核所得的一項主要論點,亦即:極為尊崇傳 統、重視權威的高達美詮釋學,原本就著重於有限個人對歷史文化的歸屬感,因此極為強調 對話參與、視域融合的問答邏輯,期望藉此維繫意義理解的連續性,並彰顯實效歷史的主動 性。與此相對的,年輕一代的意織型態批判理論者,卻從一開始就要追尋一種更高效力的, 能滿足解放效果的人類知識旨趣,亦即近代西方啟蒙主義以來所講求的知識效果,讓理性持 續透過反思式自我批判而趨向自主與成熟的進步。 |
英文摘要 | In this paper I study retrospectively the debate between philosophical hermeneutics of Hans-Georg Gadamer on the one hand and the critique of ideology or critical theory on the other hand. As regard to a new approach in the methodology of social sciences, Karl-Otto Apel and Jurgen Habermas, who are two most important representatives of the latter camp, take a different way from that of hermeneutics. Although this debate happened in the later 60s and early 70s, its effects last till the whole 80s, and even the philosophical discussions today are still under its inspirations. In Gadamer's hermeneutics, the great traditions are revitalized again through our interpretive participation, which serves itself as a part of traditions and even uphold actively in their continuation. Gadamer tends to keep the good things going on for us rather than to put them under severe examination. The traditional values could be transmitted and conveyed into the present in living dialogues, with respect to the continuity of history in this way. But the critical theorists of younger generation appreciate this conservative approach very little. Their early attacks on Gadamer show their further development toward a intersubjectively more interactive communication theory, which steps progressively on a post-conventional level, and can therefore fulfill their social task better and more confidently. In the final part, I introduce the French philosopher Paul Ricoeur as a very qualified mediator between the two parties, although his own thought counts as a new version of hermeneutics too. His critique of Gadamer's "hermeneutics of recollection" makes some convincing points from the side of critique of ideology on Gadamer even more acceptable. Ricoeur concludes that the cultural tradition and the critique of ideology are not to be treated separately. A conclusion that Gadamer will finally agree, either. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。