頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 詮釋學循環:史萊瑪赫、海德格和高達美=On the Hermeneutic Circle of Schleiermacher, Heidegger and Gadamer |
---|---|
作 者 | 陳榮華; | 書刊名 | 國立臺灣大學哲學論評 |
卷 期 | 23 2000.01[民89.01] |
頁 次 | 頁97-99+101-136 |
分類號 | 147.79 |
關鍵詞 | 高達美; 史萊瑪赫; 海德格; 詮釋學; 詮釋學循環; Gadamer; Schleiermacher; Heidegger; Hermeneutics; Hermeneutic circle; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 史萊瑪赫、海德格的〈存有與時間〉和高達美都曾討論詮釋學循環的概念。雖然海德格認為他的詮釋學循環是瞭解( Verstehen, understanding )本身的結構,但本文要指出,它依然擁有史萊瑪赫詮釋學循環的性格--一個方法論的概念。這是說,兩者都是用以證實一個結論。另一方面,高達美雖號稱其詮釋學循環來自海德格哲學,不過,本文卻要指出高達美的詮釋學循環,已完全擺脫方法論的意涵,因為它不是用以證實一個結論,而是讓真理得以出現。 |
英文摘要 | The concept of hermeneutic circle appears in the works of Schleierrmacher, Heidegger and Gadamer. In this essay I argue that although Heidegger, in Being and Time, thinks that his concept of hermeneutic circle belongs to the structure of understanding, it still possesses a characteristic of Schleiermacher's hermeneutic circle, namely, both of them are methodological concepts. However, although Gadamer claims that his concept of hermeneutic circle is developed out of Heidegger's philosophy, I show that it is no longer a methodological concept, but is the happening of truth. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。