頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 高中學生的辯護與反駁之研究--偽氣體理論=The Research on Defense and Refutation of Senior High School Students--Pseudo-theory of Gas |
---|---|
作 者 | 洪振方; 李世勳; | 書刊名 | 科學與教育學報 |
卷 期 | 4 2000.06[民89.06] |
頁 次 | 頁277-305 |
分類號 | 523.7333315 |
關鍵詞 | 高中; 偽氣體理論; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 近年來,認知心理學的興起,使科學教育界逐漸重視探索學生認知的機制與歷程。因此,本研究透過科學史及科學哲學關於多元理論競爭的殷發,將學生關於氣體的另有概念彙整為「偽氣體理論」,來讓學生進行辯論與反駁論證。本研究工具以開放式問卷呈現。以「質」的剖析結合「量」的探討來對高二學生的作答進行分析。本研究的主要研究結果:(一),「偽氣體理論」內容所包含的另有概念中,有九個概念是學生常會選來與「偽氣體理論」內容連結,並且常贊同者;有兩個概念是學生常會選來與「偽氣體理論」內容連結,並且常本贊同者。(二),學生閱讀相關氣體實驗後,有其常引用來贊同或本贊同「偽氣體理論」內容的實驗。(三),學生在閱讀氣體相關實驗前,針對「偽氣體理論」的重點進行辯護時引用的推理類型以原理-思考的推理次數最多(336次);針對「偽氣體理論上的重點進行辯護時引用的推理類型以直觀思考的推理次數次多(213次)(四人學生在閱讀氣體相關實驗前,針對學生在對「偽氣體理論」的重點進行反駁時引用的推理類型也以原理-思考的推理次數最多(215次)。 上述之研究成果除了可以作為科學教師教學上的參考資料,更可以提供科學教育家進一步探索學生建構氣體相關概念的內在認知歷程之參考資料。 |
英文摘要 | With cognitive psychology emerging as mainstream psychology, research on science education ahs been increasingly focusing on the exploration for students' cognitive mechanism and process in science learning. Therefore, this study, through the inspiration initiated by the competition of multi-theories concerning history and philosophy of science, combined students' alternative conceptions of gas into the "pseudo-theory of gas" to investigate senior high school students' defense and refutation on "pseudo theory of gas" Data collected was in the form of the open-ended questionnaire. The qualitative analysis, along with quantitative study, conducted the investigation of how and why the eleventh grade students (the second grade in senior high school in Taiwan) have the answers to the questions. The highlighted results include the following: 1). Among the alternative conceptions included in the content of the "pseudo-theory of gas," students, in terms of their connection with the "pseudo-theory of gas," often chose and supported nine alternative conceptions, while there were two alternative conceptions frequently opposed by students. 2). After studying the experiments pertinent to gas, students had the preference for certain experiments to support or oppose the content of "pseudo-theory of gas." |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。