查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- Trade Liberalization and the Rice Policy in Japan, Korea and Taiwan
- 我國畜牧事業的願景--也談貿易自由化及畜牧法對產業發展的意義
- 加入WTO對我國產業的影響
- 貿易自由化下主要國家農業政策的調整及對我國未來農業施政的意義
- APEC貿易自由化下糧食體系之趨勢
- 我國畜產事業的願景--也談貿易自由化及畜牧法對產業發展的意義
- 我國畜產事業的願景--也談貿易自由化及畜牧法對產業發展的意義
- 我國畜產事業的願景也談貿易自由化及畜牧法對產業發展的意義
- Taiwan's Agricultural Policy Adjustments for Trade Liberalization
- 從貿易自由化看糧食安全
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | Trade Liberalization and the Rice Policy in Japan, Korea and Taiwan=貿易自由化與日、韓、臺之稻米政策 |
---|---|
作 者 | 傅祖壇; 李元和; 陳建宏; 陳依文; | 書刊名 | 農業與經濟 |
卷期 | 24 2000.06[民89.06] |
頁次 | 頁1-32 |
分類號 | 431.91 |
關鍵詞 | 稻米政策; 貿易自由化; WTO; Rice policy; Trade liberalization; |
語文 | 英文(English) |
中文摘要 | 日本與南韓自1995年前起承諾其稻米以最低進口量方式開放進口,臺灣雖未加入河,但在中美雙邊談判中,承諾加入WTO後將如同日本模式開放稻米進口。惟日本於1999年卻稱其稱其稻米進口採關稅化方式。日本為何有此較變?南韓、臺灣是否也應追隨日本之改訬?本文將分別從各國農業部門之結構特性,市場對進口米之反應,以侑結構調整政策實施成效等方面分析此課題。文中亦探討政府決策之影響因子,其中糧食安全考量、對農民所得支持、及稻米耕作之環境與社會功能等,屬於具政治上重要性因子,而政府預算之分配與限制侑稻米之口質考量等因子,則具經濟重要性。最後,我們亦提出幾項可供APEC及WTO會參考之政策建議。 |
英文摘要 | In accordance with their TWO agreements on agriculture, Japan and Korea have fulfilled their minimum access rice import commitments since 1995 Taiwan. In its latest bilateral negotiations with the U.S. also committed to apply the minimum access scheme for rice imports once Taiwan is allowed to enter WTO. Recently, Japan decide to abandon the minimum market access scheme for rice imports and applied the tariffication scheme starting from April 1999. why the Japanese government decided to accept tariffication and whether or not he Korean or Taiwanese government will follow in Japan's footsteps or will instead opt for the minimum access scheme for rice imports are interesting and complicated questions which deserve further investigation. This paper attempts to analyze these issues by examining the structure of the agricultural sector market responses to rice imports and the effects of adjustment policies on the three economies for Japan, Korea and Taiwan. In comparing policies between countries factors that affect policy markers' decisions are analyzed. Among these factors are such as food security concerns, income support to farmers and the environmental/social function of rice cultivation, all of which are politically important to citizens in Japan, Korea and Taiwan Governmental budget constraints and allocation as well as the question of rice quality are economically important to policy makers. Finally, some policy recommendation for WTO or APEC member economies are put forward. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。