查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 正常足月新生兒腋溫及背溫測量之比較
- 某區域教學醫院病人體溫測量之比較分析
- Intravenous Immunoglobulin in the Treatment of Full-Term and Premature Newborns with Sepsis
- A Survey of Bone Mineral Content and Density in Full-term and Preterm Infants
- 足月新生兒腎臟水排泄之分析
- The Effect of Postural Change on Physiological Functions in Fullterm Neonates
- 足月新生兒之神經學檢查
- Clinical evaluation of transcutaneous Jaundice meter in full-term newborns
- 中國成人的口溫, 腋溫和肛溫之測定
- 智慧衣感溫元件位置對腋溫量測準確度的影響
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 正常足月新生兒腋溫及背溫測量之比較=A Comparison of Axillary and Skin-to-Mattress Temperature in Stable Full-term Neonates |
---|---|
作者 | 邱春蘭; 張瑩如; | 書刊名 | 護理雜誌 |
卷期 | 47:6 2000.12[民89.12] |
頁次 | 頁43-52 |
分類號 | 417.5012 |
關鍵詞 | 足月新生兒; 腋溫; 背溫; Full-term neonate; Axillary temperature; Skin-to-mattress temperature; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本研究目的為坽探討足月新生兒腋溫與背溫測量達穩定溫度及最大溫 度之時間,及其所測得之平均溫度﹔夌比較腋溫與背溫間之差異及相關性﹔奅探 討腋溫與背溫測量之理想時間。以立意取樣方式,於南部某醫學中心之嬰兒室針 對32位正常足月新生兒,以水銀體溫計先後測量背溫15分鐘、腋溫10分鐘。研究 者每分鐘紀錄溫度變化,直到水銀在體溫計中不再上升的狀態持續一分鐘即達穩 定溫度,而在穩定溫度後所獲得的最大體溫計刻度即為最大溫度值。研究結果顯 示:坽腋溫之穩定及最大溫度分別為36.9 .2℃及37 .2℃,其所需之測量時間分 別為3.3 .7分鐘及5.9 2.4分鐘;夌背溫之穩定及最大溫度分別36.6 .3℃及 36.8 .2℃,所需時間分別為4.3 .9分鐘及8.8 3.5分鐘。比較腋溫與背溫之穩定 溫度、最大溫度及所需之測量時間,在統計上均呈現顯著之差異(p < .001);奅 在 測量時間達7分鐘後,背溫與腋溫呈現高度正相關(r > .8);妵 理想的背溫與腋溫 之測量時間均應在10分鐘以上。此研究結果可供護理人員測量正常足月新生兒體 溫之參考依據。 |
英文摘要 | The purpose of this study was to explore stabilization temperatures (reading constant for 1 minute) and maximum temperatures at axillary and skin-to-mattress sites. Thirty-two normal full-term neonates were purposely chosen from a nursery of a medical center in southern Taiwan. Axillary and skin-to-mattress temperatures were measured consecutively for 10 and 15 minutes respectively, using a glass thermometer. Results revealed that 坽 stabilization temperature and maximum temperature at axilla were 36.9 0.2℃ and 37 0.2℃ with required measuring times of 3.3 0.7 minutes and 5.9 2.4 minutes respectively; 夌 stabilization temperature and maximum temperature for skin-to-mattress were 36.6 0.3℃ and 36.8 0.2℃ with required measuring times of 4.3 0.9 minutes and 8.8 3.5 minutes respectively, which were significantly different from the measures at the axillary site (p < .001); 奅 skin-to-mattress and axillary temperatures were highly correlated (r > .8) while the measuring time D7 minutes, and 妵the optimal placement time (90% of infants reaching stabilization temperature at axillary or skin-to-mattress sites) was D10 minutes. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。