查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 程序正義與分配正義:臺灣企業員工的正義知覺與工作態度
- Process and Outcome: Gender Differences and Sex-Role Traits in the Assessment of Justice--With the Banking Industry in Taipei Area as an Illustration
- 合理契約論與分配正義
- 團體認同、正義知覺與生涯期望關係之研究--以國防大學成員為樣本
- 從有關公平判斷的研究結果看中國人之人己關係的界限
- 中國大陸公部門人事錄用制度的正義議題
- 正義與情理 : 偏袒與重才的人事決定對主管的公正及人情評價之影響
- 學校組織正義對教師組織承諾影響之研究
- 教室裡「有」正義
- 分配正義與程序正義對於矯正人員執法正當性之影響:受刑人之視角
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 程序正義與分配正義:臺灣企業員工的正義知覺與工作態度=Procedural Justice and Distributive Justice: Justice Perceptions and Work Attitudes among Business Employees in Taiwan |
---|---|
作 者 | 賴志超; 黃光國; | 書刊名 | 中華心理學刊 |
卷 期 | 42:2 2000.12[民89.12] |
頁 次 | 頁171-190 |
分類號 | 177.7 |
關鍵詞 | 華人的正義觀; 程序正義; 分配正義; 工作態度; 臺灣企業; Chinese notion of justice; Procedural justice; Distributive justice; Work attitude; Taiwan business; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本研究的目的在探討臺灣地區公民營企業員工對程序正義及分配正義的知覺與其工作態度的關係。作者首先以開收性問題探問229位企業員工,請他們說出公司對自己最不公平的事情,結果顯示:員工所報告的不公平事情集中在分配正義方面。再以一份程序正義及分配正義量表測量受試者,因素分析法共抽取五個正義因素,發現員工認知結構中同時有程序正義及分配正義的心理構念,而且各因素有緊密的關聯。以正義的五因素為預測變項,與以工作態度為效標變項作淨相關分析,結果發現:分配正義與員工工作態度的七個面向以有顯著的相關;而程序正義主義和員工對主管的評價和信任及工作滿意有關。上述研究結果符合分配正義理論的預測,但程序正義因素與工作態度的關係則較弱。臺灣企業中員工所重視的程序正義範圍不在於參與建立組織目標或政策,而在於完成工作前一階段的各項協助,例如員工工作遭遇到困難時有管道表示意見。根據本 研究的發現,探討組織正義與工作態度的關係,除了分辨正義的類型,也要考據正義觀念如何反映社會系統的特性,並受到社會中傳統信念的影響。 |
英文摘要 | The purpose of this study was to examine the relationships between justice perceptions and work attitudes among business employees in Taiwan. The study first used an openended questionnaire to 229 employees to report the most unfair event in the company. The results revealed that their responses focused on various aspects concerning distributive justice. After that, their responses to a questionnaire on procedural and distributive justice were subjected to factor analysis with promax rotation resulting in a five-factor solution. It was found that the procedural and distributive factors were significantly correlated. To examined the relationships between justice and work attitudes, partial correlation analyses showed that distributive fairness was significantly related to all of the seven measures of work attitudes, namely, evaluations of supervisor, trust in supervisor, job satisfaction, intentions to quit, interpersonal conflicts, anxiety, cognitive adaptation. In contrast, participation, a form of procedural justice, was related to evaluations of supervisor, trust in supervisor, and job satisfaction. These findings suggested that as opposed to those of Alexander and Ruderman (1987), distributive justice was more powerful than procedural justice in prediction of work attitudes of employees in businesses of Taiwan. It was also found that the most important measure of procedural justice in predicting work attitude of employees in Taiwan was the expression of their job difficulties. Taken together, these results suggest that cultural norms prevailing in a society should be taken into consideration for comprehensive understanding of the relationships between perceptions of justice and work attitude, as well as how individuals’ perceptions of justice may be influenced by their cultural tradition. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。